ArticleJAMA network open2020
Changes in Racial Disparities in Mortality After Cancer Surgery in the US, 2007-2016.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Disparities in robot utilization in colorectal surgery: the widening gap.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Major Cardiovascular Events Following Non-Cardiovascular Surgeries.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Race based disparities in clinical and financial outcomes associated with major elective and emergent surgery.Surgery open science · 2025Article
- National race and socioeconomic disparities in access to minimally invasive lung resection for early-stage lung cancer: Impact on mortality.JTCVS open · 2025Article
- Differences in outcomes by race/ethnicity after thoracic surgery in a large integrated health system.Surgery open science · 2024Article
- Adapting Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols to Promote Equity in Cancer Care and Outcomes.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024Article
- Disparities in Cancer Stage Outcomes by Catchment Areas for a Comprehensive Cancer Center.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Landscape and Saturation Analysis of Mutations Associated With Race in Cancer Genomes by Clinical Sequencing.The oncologist · 2024Article
- Association of County-Level Food Deserts and Food Swamps with Hepatopancreatobiliary Cancer Outcomes.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023Article
- Neighborhood-Level Socioeconomic Disadvantage Predicts Outcomes in Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Malignancy.Annals of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Something's got to give: How do we improve care for minorities, dual-eligible medicare, and disadvantaged patients?American journal of surgery · 2023Article
- Article
- Fecal continence outcomes and potential disparities for patients with anorectal malformations treated at referral institutions for pediatric colorectal surgery.Pediatric surgery international · 2023Article
- Rural Disparities in Lung Cancer-directed Surgery: A Medicare Cohort Study.Annals of surgery · 2023Article
- Inequities in surgical outcomes by race and sex in the United States: retrospective cohort study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2023Article
- Differential pulse oximetry readings between ethnic groups and delayed transfer to intensive care units.QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians · 2023Article
- Comparison of Simulated Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer Surgery at the Highest-Performing vs Chosen Local Hospitals.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Social determinants of health and lung cancer surgery: a qualitative study.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Disparities in Health Care Spending and Utilization Among Black and White Medicaid Enrollees.JAMA health forum · 2022Article
- Bias Issues in Colorectal Cancer Management: A Review.Annals of surgical oncology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Racial disparities are well documented in cancer care. Overall, in the US, Black patients historically have higher rates of mortality after surgery than White patients. However, it is unknown whether racial disparities in mortality after cancer surgery have changed over time. Objective: To examine whether and how disparities in mortality after cancer surgery have changed over 10 years for Black and White patients overall and for 9 specific cancers. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cross-sectional study, national Medicare data were used to examine the 10-year (January 1, 2007, to November 30, 2016) changes in postoperative mortality rates in Black and White patients. Data analysis was performed from August 6 to December 31, 2019. Participants included fee-for-service beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Part A who had a major surgical resection for 9 common types of cancer surgery: colorectal, bladder, esophageal, kidney, liver, ovarian, pancreatic, lung, or prostate cancer. Exposures: Cancer surgery among Black and White patients. Main Outcomes and Measures: Risk-adjusted 30-day, all-cause, postoperative mortality overall and for 9 specific types of cancer surgery. Results: A total of 870 929 cancer operations were performed during the 10-year study period. In the baseline year, a total of 103 446 patients had cancer operations (96 210 White patients and 7236 Black patients). Black patients were slightly younger (mean [SD] age, 73.0 [6.4] vs 74.5 [6.8] years), and there were fewer Black vs White men (3986 [55.1%] vs 55 527 [57.7%]). Overall national mortality rates following cancer surgery were lower for both Black (-0.12%; 95% CI, -0.17% to -0.06% per year) and White (-0.14%; 95% CI, -0.16% to -0.13% per year) patients. These reductions were predominantly attributable to within-hospital mortality improvements (Black patients: 0.10% annually; 95% CI, -0.15% to -0.05%; P < .001; White patients: 0.13%; 95% CI, -0.14% to -0.11%; P < .001) vs between-hospital mortality improvements. Across the 9 different cancer surgery procedures, there was no significant difference in mortality changes between Black and White patients during the period under study (eg, prostate cancer: 0.35; 95% CI, 0.02-0.68; lung cancer: 0.61; 95% CI, -0.21 to 1.44). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings offer mixed news for policy makers regarding possible reductions in racial disparities following cancer surgery. Although postoperative cancer surgery mortality rates improved for both Black and White patients, there did not appear to be any narrowing of the mortality gap between Black and White patients overall or across individual cancer surgery procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.