Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33270029›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

Visual Analytic Tools and Techniques in Population Health and Health Services Research: Scoping Review.

Jawad Ahmed Chishtie, Jean-Sebastien Marchand, Luke A Turcotte, Iwona Anna Bielska, Jessica Babineau, Monica Cepoiu-Martin, Michael Irvine, Sarah Munce, Sally Abudiab, Marko Bjelica and 4 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. VisualSphere: a Web-based Interactive Visualization System for Clinical Research Data.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jawad Ahmed ChishtieRehabilitation Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8650-4469
Jean-Sebastien MarchandUniversite de Sherbrooke, Quebec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6745-6692
Luke A TurcotteAdvanced Analytics, Canadian Institute for Health Information, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5678-7234
Iwona Anna BielskaDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4186-4871
Jessica BabineauLibrary & Information Services, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4770-0579
Monica Cepoiu-MartinData Intelligence for Health Lab, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8008-9214
Michael IrvineDepartment of Mathematics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4785-8998
Sarah MunceRehabilitation Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0595-8395
Sally AbudiabRehabilitation Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6618-5250
Marko BjelicaRehabilitation Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0540-1690
Saima HossainDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2952-8832
Muhammad ImranDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Health Services Academy, Islamabad, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-2250-9345
Tara JejiOntario Neurotrauma Foundation, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1244-5851
Susan JaglalDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2930-1443

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVisual analytics (VA) promotes the understanding of data with visual, interactive techniques, using analytic and visual engines. The analytic engine includes automated techniques, whereas common visual outputs include flow maps and spatiotemporal hot spots.

objectiveThis scoping review aims to address a gap in the literature, with the specific objective to synthesize literature on the use of VA tools, techniques, and frameworks in interrelated health care areas of population health and health services research (HSR).

methodsUsing the 2018 PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines, the review focuses on peer-reviewed journal articles and full conference papers from 2005 to March 2019. Two researchers were involved at each step, and another researcher arbitrated disagreements. A comprehensive abstraction platform captured data from diverse bodies of the literature, primarily from the computer and health sciences.

resultsAfter screening 11,310 articles, findings from 55 articles were synthesized under the major headings of visual and analytic engines, visual presentation characteristics, tools used and their capabilities, application to health care areas, data types and sources, VA frameworks, frameworks used for VA applications, availability and innovation, and co-design initiatives. We found extensive application of VA methods used in areas of epidemiology, surveillance and modeling, health services access, use, and cost analyses. All articles included a distinct analytic and visualization engine, with varying levels of detail provided. Most tools were prototypes, with 5 in use at the time of publication. Seven articles presented methodological frameworks. Toward consistent reporting, we present a checklist, with an expanded definition for VA applications in health care, to assist researchers in sharing research for greater replicability. We summarized the results in a Tableau dashboard.

conclusionsWith the increasing availability and generation of big health care data, VA is a fast-growing method applied to complex health care data. What makes VA innovative is its capability to process multiple, varied data sources to demonstrate trends and patterns for exploratory analysis, leading to knowledge generation and decision support. This is the first review to bridge a critical gap in the literature on VA methods applied to the areas of population health and HSR, which further indicates possible avenues for the adoption of these methods in the future. This review is especially important in the wake of COVID-19 surveillance and response initiatives, where many VA products have taken center stage. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/14019.

Indexed as

Data VisualizationChecklistCOVID-19Delivery of Health CareHealth Services ResearchHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalPandemicsPopulation HealthSARS-CoV-2data miningdata visualizationhealth services researchmachine learningmobile phonepopulation healthvisual analytics

Identifiers

PMID33270029
PMCPMC7716797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.