Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33269605›Full record

ArticleCartilage2021

Accuracy of MRI-Based Talar Cartilage Thickness Measurement and Talus Bone and Cartilage Modeling: Comparison with Ground-Truth Laser Scan Measurements.

Carly A Lockard, Ingrid K Stake, Alex W Brady, Madeleine G DeClercq, Kira K Tanghe, Brenton W Douglass, Erik Nott, Charles P Ho, Thomas O Clanton

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cartilage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Carly A LockardSteadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3730-4740
Ingrid K StakeSteadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO, USA.
Alex W BradySteadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO, USA.
Madeleine G DeClercqSteadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO, USA.
Kira K TangheSteadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4561-7587
Brenton W DouglassSteadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO, USA.
Erik NottThe Steadman Clinic, Vail, CO, USA.
Charles P HoSteadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO, USA.
Thomas O ClantonThe Steadman Clinic, Vail, CO, USA.
Steadman Philippon Research Institute · USSteadman Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this work was to compare measurements of talar cartilage thickness and cartilage and bone surface geometry from clinically feasible magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) against high-accuracy laser scan models. Measurement of talar bone and cartilage geometry from MRI would provide useful information for evaluating cartilage changes, selecting osteochondral graft sources or creating patient-specific joint models.

designThree-dimensional (3D) bone and cartilage models of 7 cadaver tali were created using (1) manual segmentation of high-resolution volumetric sequence 3T MR images and (2) laser scans. Talar cartilage thickness was compared between the laser scan- and MRI-based models for the dorsal, medial, and lateral surfaces. The laser scan- and MRI-based cartilage and bone surface models were compared using model-to-model distance.

resultsAverage cartilage thickness within the dorsal, medial, and lateral surfaces were 0.89 to 1.05 mm measured with laser scanning, and 1.10 to 1.22 mm measured with MRI. MRI-based thickness was 0.16 to 0.32 mm higher on average in each region. The average absolute surface-to-surface differences between laser scan- and MRI-based bone and cartilage models ranged from 0.16 to 0.22 mm for bone (MRI bone models smaller than laser scan models) and 0.35 to 0.38 mm for cartilage (MRI bone models larger than laser scan models).

conclusionsThis study demonstrated that cartilage and bone 3D modeling and measurement of average cartilage thickness on the dorsal, medial, and lateral talar surfaces using MRI were feasible and provided similar model geometry and thickness values to ground-truth laser scan-based measurements.

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularTalusCadaverHumansLasersMagnetic Resonance Imaging3D modelcartilagelaser scanMRItalus

Identifiers

PMID33269605
PMCPMC8808841
OpenAlexW3110309195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.