ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2020
Future Strategies Involving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma.
Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Undertreatment in patients with advanced urothelial cancer: systematic literature review and meta-analysis.Future oncology (London, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Organ-Specific Tumor Response to Pembrolizumab in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma After Platinum-Based Chemotherapy.OncoTargets and therapy · 2021Article
- The Association of Clinical Outcomes with Posttreatment Changes in the Relative Eosinophil Counts and Neutrophil-to-Eosinophil Ratio in Patients with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with Pembrolizumab.Cancer management and research · 2021Article
- Clinical Outcomes of Mixed Response to Pembrolizumab in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma After Platinum-based Chemotherapy.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
- VI-RADS score system - A primer for urologists.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementImmune checkpoint inhibitors have importantly improved the outcome of patients with urothelial carcinoma. Different immune checkpoint inhibitors are currently approved and used in first- and second-line setting. The multiple agents currently approved in these setting make the choice sometimes difficult for clinicians. Furthermore, only a minority of patients present drastic response and long-term benefit with current immunotherapy. In this review, we describe the current use of immunotherapy in urothelial carcinoma but we also highlight the new strategies of treatment involving immune checkpoint inhibitors; we describe the place of immunotherapy with chemotherapy, targeted agents, and anti-angiogenic agents, incorporating the recent results presented at ASCO 2020. This review explores also the different action mechanisms of immune checkpoint inhibitors and the molecular rational to evaluate these agents in other strategies, such as maintenance and salvage strategies. The new advances in biomarker development are also presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.