Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33269339›Full record

ArticleTranslational animal science2020

Development and evaluation of two different lameness models in meat goats, a pilot study.

Emily J Reppert, Michael D Kleinhenz, Abbie Viscardi, Shawnee R Montgomery, Alison R Crane, Johann F Coetzee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational animal science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emily J ReppertDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
Michael D KleinhenzDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.ORCID 0000-0001-9453-3657
Abbie ViscardiDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
Shawnee R MontgomeryDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
Alison R CraneDepartment of Animal Science and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
Johann F CoetzeeDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.ORCID 0000-0003-1802-3991
Kansas State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lameness is a serious health concern for livestock species. Understanding individual animal response to pain and characterization of lameness are critical when developing appropriate treatments. The objectives of this pilot study was to evaluate two different lameness models and measures for determining response to induced lameness in meat goats. Lameness was induced by intraarticular injection into the left hind lateral claw distal interphalangeal joint with either amphotericin B (Amp-B) or kaolin-carrageenan (K-C). Response to lameness was characterized by behavior scoring, visual lameness scoring (VLS), infrared thermography (IRT) of the affected digit, pressure mat gait analysis (PMT), and plasma cortisol (CORT) analysis. Lame goats had higher VLS compared to controls (

Indexed as

arthritiscaprinegoatlameness model

Identifiers

PMID33269339
PMCPMC7684871
OpenAlexW3096555789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.