Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33269320›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy international open2020

Safety and adequacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided random liver biopsy in comparison with transjugular and percutaneous approaches.

Neil Bhogal, Bernadette Lamb, Benjamin Arbeiter, Sarah Malik, Harlan Sayles, Audrey J Lazenby, Saurabh Chandan, Amaninder Dhaliwal, Shailender Singh, Ishfaq Bhat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy international open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Endo-Hepatology: Paradigm Shift in Endosonographic Diagnosis for Liver Disease to Digestive Endoscopy.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. EUS-guidedEndoscopic ultrasound
    Article
  15. Review
  16. EUS-guidedEndoscopic ultrasound
    Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Neil BhogalDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States.
Bernadette LambDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE.
Benjamin ArbeiterDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE.
Sarah MalikDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States.
Harlan SaylesDepartment of Biostatistics, College of Public Health. University of Nebraska Medical Center, Nebraska, United States.
Audrey J LazenbyDepartment of Pathology & Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States.
Saurabh ChandanDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States.
Amaninder DhaliwalDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States.
Shailender SinghDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States.
Ishfaq BhatDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID33269320
PMCPMC7671753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.