ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2020
Fedora-type magnetic compression anastomosis device for intestinal anastomosis.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- First-in-Human Side-to-Side Magnetic Compression Duodeno-ileostomy with the Magnet Anastomosis System.Obesity surgery · 2023Trial
- Advantages of magnetic compression in rat colonic anastomosis: a comparative study with a transcriptomic perspective.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Review
- Enhanced hemocompatibility and rapid magnetic anastomosis of electrospun small-diameter artificial vascular grafts.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- The sealing effect of magnetic-sealing uterine manipulator in isolated uterus from patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a pre-clinical study.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2023Article
- Side-to-side duodeno-ileal magnetic compression anastomosis: design and feasibility of a novel device in a porcine model.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Creation of gastroenteric anastomosis through natural orifice in rats by magnetic compression technique.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Magnetic challenge against gastroesophageal reflux.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough previous studies have confirmed the feasibility of magnetic compression anastomosis (MCA), there is still a risk of long-term anastomotic stenosis. For traditional MCA devices, a large device is associated with great pressure, and eventually increased leakage.
aimTo develop a novel MCA device to simultaneously meet the requirements of pressure and size.
methodsTraditional nummular MCA devices of all possible sizes were used to conduct ileac anastomosis in rats. The mean (± SD) circumference of the ileum was 13.34 ± 0.12 mm. Based on short- and long-term follow-up results, we determined the appropriate pressure range and minimum size. Thereafter, we introduced a novel "fedora-type" MCA device, which entailed the use of a nummular magnet with a larger sheet metal.
resultsWith traditional MCA devices, the anastomoses experienced stenosis and even closure during the long-term follow-up when the anastomat was smaller than Φ5 mm. However, the risk of leakage increased when it was larger than Φ4 mm. On comparison of the different designs, it was found that the "fedora-type" MCA device should be composed of a Φ4-mm nummular magnet with a Φ6-mm sheet metal.
conclusionThe diameter of the MCA device should be greater than 120% of the enteric diameter. The novel "fedora-type" MCA device controls the pressure and optimizes the size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.