Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33268540›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2021

Comparison of ZMAC and MARC-145 Cell Lines for Improving Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Isolation from Clinical Samples.

Wannarat Yim-Im, Haiyan Huang, Jie Park, Chong Wang, Gabriela Calzada, Phillip Gauger, Karen Harmon, Rodger Main, Jianqiang Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Considerations in the use of processing fluids for the detection of PRRSV RNA and antibody.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wannarat Yim-ImVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.
Haiyan HuangVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.
Jie ParkVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.
Chong WangVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.
Gabriela CalzadaAptimmune Biologics, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Phillip GaugerVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2540-8769
Karen HarmonVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.
Rodger MainVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.
Jianqiang ZhangVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA jqzhang@iastate.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7228-6202
Iowa State University · USAptimmune Biologics (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The MARC-145 cell line is commonly used to isolate porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) for diagnostics, research, and vaccine production, but it yields frustratingly low success rates of virus isolation (VI). The ZMAC cell line, derived from porcine alveolar macrophages, has become available, but its utilization for PRRSV VI from clinical samples has not been evaluated. This study compared PRRSV VI results in ZMAC and MARC-145 cells from 375 clinical samples (including 104 lung, 140 serum, 90 oral fluid, and 41 processing fluid samples). The PRRSV VI success rate was very low in oral fluids and processing fluids regardless of whether ZMAC cells or MARC-145 cells were used. Success rates of PRRSV VI from lung and serum samples were significantly higher in ZMAC than in MARC-145 cells. Lung and serum samples with threshold cycle (

Indexed as

Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory SyndromePorcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virusAnimalsCell LineLungSwineVirus Replicationgenetic lineageMARC-145porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virusvirus isolationZMAC

Identifiers

PMID33268540
PMCPMC8106717
OpenAlexW3108083837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.