Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33268507›Full record

ReviewScience translational medicine2020

A blueprint for translational regenerative medicine.

James P K Armstrong, Timothy J Keane, Anne C Roques, P Stephen Patrick, Claire M Mooney, Wei-Li Kuan, Venkat Pisupati, Richard O C Oreffo, Daniel J Stuckey, Fiona M Watt and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Guidance on biomaterials for periodontal tissue regeneration: Fabrication methods, materials and biological considerations.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Mechanobiology in medicine · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. X-Ray Visible Protein Scaffolds by Bulk Iodination.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

James P K ArmstrongDepartment of Materials, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK. james.armstrong@imperial.ac.uk m.stevens@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0599-0643
Timothy J KeaneDepartment of Materials, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7975-0538
Anne C RoquesDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
P Stephen PatrickCentre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging, University College London, London WC1E 6DD, UK.
Claire M MooneyCentre for Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Wei-Li KuanJohn van Geest Centre for Brain Repair and Wellcome - MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0PY, UK.
Venkat PisupatiJohn van Geest Centre for Brain Repair and Wellcome - MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0PY, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4414-786X
Richard O C OreffoCentre for Human Development, Stem Cells and Regeneration, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5995-6726
Daniel J StuckeyCentre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging, University College London, London WC1E 6DD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8888-627X
Fiona M WattCentre for Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9151-5154
Stuart J ForbesCentre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4UU, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3715-2561
Roger A BarkerJohn van Geest Centre for Brain Repair and Wellcome - MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0PY, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8843-7730
Molly M StevensDepartment of Materials, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK. james.armstrong@imperial.ac.uk m.stevens@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7335-266X

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/15/33/31608British Heart Foundation RM/17/1/33377European Research Council 616417Medical Research Council MC_PC_12009Medical Research Council MC_PC_17230Medical Research Council MR/K017047/1Medical Research Council MR/K026666/1Medical Research Council MR/K026739/1Medical Research Council MR/L012626/1Medical Research Council MR/L022699/1Medical Research Council MR/R015635/1Medical Research Council MR/R015651/1Medical Research Council MR/R015724/1Medical Research Council MR/R026416/1Medical Research Council MR/S00551X/1Medical Research Council MR/S005528/1Versus Arthritis 21138Wellcome Trust 098411Wellcome Trust 208858Wellcome Trust 208858/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The past few decades have produced a large number of proof-of-concept studies in regenerative medicine. However, the route to clinical adoption is fraught with technical and translational obstacles that frequently consign promising academic solutions to the so-called "valley of death." Here, we present a proposed blueprint for translational regenerative medicine. We offer principles to help guide the selection of cells and materials, present key in vivo imaging modalities, and argue that the host immune response should be considered throughout design and development. Last, we suggest a pathway to navigate the often complex regulatory and manufacturing landscape of translational regenerative medicine.

Indexed as

Regenerative MedicineTranslational Research, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID33268507
PMCPMC7610850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.