ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2020
Red meat intake and risk of coronary heart disease among US men: prospective cohort study.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
89 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 192 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between red meat consumption and risk of stroke: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Association between dietary protein intake and risk of chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Pooled it
- Global Insights into Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 6,400,000 Patients.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Health effects associated with consumption of unprocessed red meat: a Burden of Proof study.Nature medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Systematic review of the impact of a plant-based diet on prostate cancer incidence and outcomes.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2022Pooled it
- Red meat consumption and risk for dyslipidaemia and inflammation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Trial
- Assessment of Vascular Function in Response to High-Fat and Low-Fat Ground Beef Consumption in Men.Nutrients · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Improvement of glycemic indices by a hypocaloric legume-based DASH diet in adults with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.European journal of nutrition · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Protein Paradox: Protein Quality Based on Amino Acids Composition is Poorly Associated with Health Outcomes.Current nutrition reports · 2026Review
- Article
- Global, regional and national burden of ischemic heart disease attributable to suboptimal diet, 1990-2023: a Global Burden of Disease study.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Neuroprotective Effects of Time-Restricted Feeding Combined With Different Protein Sources in MPTP-Induced Parkinson's Disease Mice Model and Its Modulatory Impact on Gut Microbiota Metabolism.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- How inadequate dietary patterns affect global burden of ischemic heart disease.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Association between red meat intake and diabetes: a cross-sectional analysis of a nationally representative sample of US adults (NHANES 2003-2016).The British journal of nutrition · 2026Article
- Physicochemical Properties of Safflower (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- "Shaking the ladder" reveals how analytic choices can influence associations in nutrition epidemiology: beef intake and coronary heart disease as a case study.Critical reviews in food science and nutrition · 2026Review
29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo study total, processed, and unprocessed red meat in relation to risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) and to estimate the effects of substituting other protein sources for red meat with CHD risk.
designProspective cohort study with repeated measures of diet and lifestyle factors.
settingHealth Professionals Follow-Up Study cohort, United States, 1986-2016.
participants43 272 men without cardiovascular disease or cancer at baseline.
main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was total CHD, comprised of acute non-fatal myocardial infarction or fatal CHD. Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals across categories of red meat consumption. Substitution analyses were conducted by comparing coefficients for red meat and the alternative food in models, including red meat and alternative foods as continuous variables.
resultsDuring 1 023 872 person years of follow-up, 4456 incident CHD events were documented of which 1860 were fatal. After multivariate adjustment for dietary and non-dietary risk factors, total, unprocessed, and processed red meat intake were each associated with a modestly higher risk of CHD (hazard ratio for one serving per day increment: 1.12 (95% confidence interval 1.06 to 1.18) for total red meat, 1.11 (1.02 to 1.21) for unprocessed red meat, and 1.15 (1.06 to 1.25) for processed red meat). Compared with red meat, the intake of one serving per day of combined plant protein sources (nuts, legumes, and soy) was associated with a lower risk of CHD (0.86 (0.80 to 0.93) compared with total red meat, 0.87 (0.79 to 0.95) compared with unprocessed red meat, and 0.83 (0.76 to 0.91) compared with processed red meat). Substitutions of whole grains and dairy products for total red meat and eggs for processed red meat were also associated with lower CHD risk.
conclusionsSubstituting high quality plant foods such as legumes, nuts, or soy for red meat might reduce the risk of CHD. Substituting whole grains and dairy products for total red meat, and eggs for processed red meat, might also reduce this risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.