Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33268434›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Endoscopic polypectomy performed in clinic for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: study protocol for the EPIC multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Shaun Kilty, Kednapa Thavorn, Arif Janjua, John Lee, Kristian MacDonald, Eric Meen, Damian Micomonaco, Brian Rotenberg, Leigh J Sowerby, Marc Tewfik and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02975310 (Endoscopic Polypectomy Performed In Clinic for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Polyps), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02975310 narecruitingnot on this map

Endoscopic Polypectomy Performed In Clinic for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Polyps: The EPIC Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorOttawa Hospital Research InstituteRan2017 to 2026Enrolled140ConditionsSinusitis, Nasal PolypsArmsEndoscopic polypectomy in clinic (EPIC), Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (ESS), General Anesthesia, Local and topical anesthesia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Assessing the safety and tolerability of rhinologic surgery under local anesthetic: an 8-year retrospective analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Shaun KiltyClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada skilty@toh.ca.
Kednapa ThavornClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Arif JanjuaDepartment of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
John LeeDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Saint Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kristian MacDonaldDepartment of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Eric MeenDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Damian MicomonacoDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
Brian RotenbergDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Leigh J SowerbyDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Marc TewfikDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Susan AdamsPatient Representative, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Hubert FrenettePatient Representative, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Andrea LassoClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9552-264X
Dean A FergussonClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
University of Ottawa · CAWestern University · CADalhousie University · CAMcGill University · CANOSM University · CAOttawa Hospital · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

CIHR PJT148734
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is common, with a Canadian prevalence of 5%, and associated with significant morbidity. Understandably, CRS impairs workplace productivity but that productivity substantially increases following surgical treatment. CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), the most common type of CRS, is usually treated with a combination of medications and endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Historically, surgical treatment has only been performed in the operating room at a cost of about $C3500. However, recent studies have shown that a de-escalated procedure, endoscopic polypectomy performed in clinic (EPIC), can provide an improvement in patient symptoms to levels equal to those for ESS. Moreover, EPIC has additional proposed advantages including shorter recovery time, significantly lower cost to the healthcare system and shorter wait time for the patient. There is currently insufficient evidence to draw conclusions about the superiority of polypectomy or ESS for the management of CRSwNP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We designed a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial to evaluate whether EPIC was non-inferior to the current clinical standard, ESS for the treatment of CRSwNP. The primary outcome is the Sinonasal Outcome Test-22 score measured at baseline and at 3 months after surgery. Other outcomes include peak nasal inspiratory flow, quality of life measured by the EuroQoL 5 Dimensions 5 Levels questionnaire and work impairment using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire.We aim to recruit 140 patients from sites across Canada. Participants will be randomly assigned to EPIC or ESS and followed up for 3 months in clinic after the procedure. Additionally, participants will enter a 5-year long-term follow-up period. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Ottawa Health Sciences Network Research Ethics Board for all sites in Ontario, Canada (study number CTO0801). Sites located outside of Ontario obtained approval from their local/institutional research ethics board. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02975310.

Indexed as

Nasal PolypsRhinitisSinusitisChronic DiseaseEndoscopyHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicOntarioQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcomeadult otolaryngologyendoscopic surgeryhealth economics

Identifiers

PMID33268434
PMCPMC7713191
OpenAlexW3110478721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.