Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33268429›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Study protocol for evaluation of aid to diagnosis for developmental dysplasia of the hip in general practice: controlled trial randomised by practice.

Andreas Roposch, Kaltuun Warsame, Angel Chater, Judith Green, Rachael Hunter, John Wood, Nick Freemantle, Irwin Nazareth

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04101903 (Evaluation of Aid to Diagnosis for Congenital Dysplasia of the Hip in General Practice), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04101903 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Evaluation of Aid to Diagnosis for Congenital Dysplasia of the Hip in General Practice: Controlled Randomised Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation TrustRan2020 to 2027Enrolled172ConditionsDevelopmental Dysplasia of the HipArmsThe 6-week Hip Checklist
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas RoposchGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, UCL, London, UK a.roposch@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0143-7840
Kaltuun WarsameGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, UCL, London, UK.
Angel ChaterDepartment of Sport Science and Physical, University of Bedfordshire, Luton, UK.
Judith GreenDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Kings College London, London, UK.
Rachael HunterResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7447-8934
John WoodPRIMENT Clinical Trials Unit, UCL, London, UK.
Nick FreemantleComprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, UCL, London, UK.
Irwin NazarethResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL, London, UK.
MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Bedfordshire · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0616-20006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn the UK, a compulsory '6-week hip check' is performed in primary care for the detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). However, missed diagnoses and infants incorrectly labelled with DDH remain a problem, potentially leading to adverse consequences for infants, their families and the National Health Service. National policy states that infants should be referred to hospital if the 6-week check suggests DDH, though there is no available tool to aid examination or offer guidelines for referral. We developed standardised diagnostic criteria for DDH, based on international Delphi consensus, and a 9-item checklist that has the potential to enable non-experts to diagnose DDH in a manner approaching that of experts. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a controlled trial randomised by practice that will compare a diagnostic aid against standard care for the hip check. The primary objective is to determine whether an aid to the diagnosis of DDH reduces the number of clinically insignificant referrals from primary care to hospital and the number of late diagnosed DDH. The trial will include a qualitative process evaluation, an assessment of professional behavioural change and a full health economic evaluation. We will recruit 152 general practitioner practices in England. These will be randomised to conduct the hip checks with use of the study diagnostic aid and/or as per usual practice. The total number of infants seen during a 15-month recruitment period will be 110 per practice. Two years after the 6-week hip check, we will measure the number of referred infants that are (1) clinically insignificant for DDH and (2) those that constitute appropriate referrals. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has approval from the Health Research Authority (16/1/2020) and the Confidentiality Advisory Group (18/2/2020). Results will be published in peer-reviewed academic journals, disseminated to patient organisations and the media. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04101903; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Developmental Dysplasia of the HipGeneral PracticeHip Dislocation, CongenitalEnglandHumansInfantRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicState Medicinepaediatric orthopaedicspaediatricsprimary carepublic health

Identifiers

PMID33268429
PMCPMC7713187
OpenAlexW3109229058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.