Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33268418›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

British Thoracic Society survey of rehabilitation to support recovery of the post-COVID-19 population.

Sally J Singh, Amy C Barradell, Neil J Greening, Charlotte Bolton, Gisli Jenkins, Louise Preston, John R Hurst

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05736939 (Gender Differences in the Recovery Rate Following a Hybrid Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programme in Patients With Long COVID-19 Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05736939 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Gender Differences in the Recovery Rate Following a Hybrid Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programme in Patients With Long COVID-19 Syndrome

TypeobservationalSponsorNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensRan2022 to 2023Enrolled30ConditionsPost Acute COVID-19 SyndromeArmsOut-patient Pulmonary Rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Clinical standards for diagnosis, treatment and prevention of post-COVID-19 lung disease.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Models of Support for Caregivers and Patients with the Post-COVID-19 Condition: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Short-term Pulmonary Rehabilitation after Recovering from Severe COVID-19.International journal of preventive medicine · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sally J SinghCentre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre-Respiratory, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK sally.singh@uhl-tr.nhs.uk.
Amy C BarradellCentre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre-Respiratory, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3688-8879
Neil J GreeningCentre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre-Respiratory, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
Charlotte BoltonNIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre Respiratory Theme, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Gisli JenkinsNIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre Respiratory Theme, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Louise PrestonCommunications, Education and Quality Improvement, British Thoracic Society, London, UK.
John R HurstUCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7246-6040

Funding

Department of Health PDF-2017-10-052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA proportion of those recovering from COVID-19 are likely to have significant and ongoing symptoms, functional impairment and psychological disturbances. There is an immediate need to develop a safe and efficient discharge process and recovery programme. Established rehabilitation programmes are well placed to deliver a programme for this group but will most likely need to be adapted for the post-COVID-19 population. The purpose of this survey was to rapidly identify the components of a post-COVID-19 rehabilitation assessment and elements of a successful rehabilitation programme that would be required to deliver a comprehensive service for those post-COVID-19 to inform service delivery.

designA survey comprising a series of closed questions and a free-text comment box allowing for a qualitative analysis.

settingOnline survey.

participantsMultiprofessional clinicians across specialties were invited to take part.

results1031 participants responded from a broad range of specialties. There was overwhelming support for an early posthospital discharge recovery programme to advise patients about the management of fatigue (95% agreed/strongly agreed), breathlessness (94%) and mood disturbances (including symptoms of anxiety and depression, 92%). At the time point of 6-8 weeks, an assessment was considered important, focusing on a broad range of possible symptoms and supporting a return to work. Recommendations for the intervention described a holistic programme focusing on symptom management, return of function and return to employment. The free-text comments added depth to the survey and the need 'not to reinvent the wheel' but rather adapt well-established rehabilitation services to individually tailor needs-based care with continued learning for service development.

conclusionThe responses indicate a huge interest and the urgent need to establish a programme to support and mitigate the long-term impact of COVID-19 by optimising and individualising existing rehabilitation programmes.

Indexed as

Program DevelopmentCooperative BehaviorCOVID-19HumansPandemicsRecovery of FunctionSARS-CoV-2Societies, MedicalSurveys and Questionnairesrehabilitation medicinerespiratory medicine (see thoracic medicine)

Identifiers

PMID33268418
PMCPMC7712930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.