Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33267879›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2020

Birth attendants' hand hygiene compliance in healthcare facilities in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

Giorgia Gon, Mícheál de Barra, Lucia Dansero, Stephen Nash, Oona M R Campbell

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giorgia GonLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. giorgia.gon@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9741-7712
Mícheál de BarraBrunel University London, Department of Life Sciences, Uxbridge, UK.
Lucia DanseroIndependent researcher, Turin, Italy.
Stephen NashLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Oona M R CampbellLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K012126/1Medical Research Council MR/N015975/1Medical Research Council MR/R019274/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith an increasing number of women delivering in healthcare facilities in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMICs), healthcare workers' hand hygiene compliance on labour wards is pivotal to preventing infections. Currently there are no estimates of how often birth attendants comply with hand hygiene, or of the factors influencing compliance in healthcare facilities in LMICs.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review to investigate the a) level of compliance, b) determinants of compliance and c) interventions to improve hand hygiene during labour and delivery among birth attendants in healthcare facilities of LMICs. We also aimed to assess the quality of the included studies and to report the intra-cluster correlation for studies conducted in multiple facilities.

resultsWe obtained 797 results across four databases and reviewed 71 full texts. Of these, fifteen met our inclusion criteria. Overall, the quality of the included studies was particularly compromised by poorly described sampling methods and definitions. Hand hygiene compliance varied substantially across studies from 0 to 100%; however, the heterogeneity in definitions of hand hygiene did not allow us to combine or compare these meaningfully. The five studies with larger sample sizes and clearer definitions estimated compliance before aseptic procedures opportunities, to be low (range: 1-38%). Three studies described two multi-component interventions, both were shown to be feasible.

conclusionsHand hygiene compliance was low for studies with larger sample sizes and clear definitions. This poses a substantial challenge to infection prevention during birth in LMICs facilities. We also found that the quality of many studies was suboptimal. Future studies of hand hygiene compliance on the labour ward should be designed with better sampling frames, assess inter-observer agreement, use measures to improve the quality of data collection, and report their hand hygiene definitions clearly.

Indexed as

Cross InfectionHand HygieneDelivery of Health CareDeveloping CountriesFemaleGuideline AdherenceHand DisinfectionHealth FacilitiesHumansPregnancyHand hygieneHealthcare workersLabourMaternal and newborn health

Identifiers

PMID33267879
PMCPMC7713338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.