Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33267848›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2020

Predictors of skin and soft tissue infections among sample of rural residents who inject drugs.

Amelia Baltes, Wajiha Akhtar, Jen Birstler, Heidi Olson-Streed, Kellene Eagen, David Seal, Ryan Westergaard, Randall Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amelia BaltesDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA. amelia.baltes@fammed.wisc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0416-9810
Wajiha AkhtarDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Jen BirstlerDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Heidi Olson-StreedWisconsin Department of Health Services Hepatitis C Program, Madison, USA.
Kellene EagenDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
David SealSchool of Public Health and Tropical Disease, Tulane University, New Orleans, USA.
Ryan WestergaardDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Randall BrownDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.

Funding

Community-based, client-centered prevention homes to address the rural opioid epidemicUG3DA044826 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SEAL, DAVID W, WESTERGAARD, RYAN PATRICK · 2017 to 2018
$1.4M
NIDA NIH HHS UG3 DA044826NIDA NIH HHS UG3DA044826
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSkin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality for people who inject drugs (PWID). Studies demonstrate that certain injection practices correlate with SSTI incidence among PWID. The opioid epidemic in the USA has particularly affected rural communities, where access to prevention and treatment presents unique challenges. This study aims to estimate unsafe injection practices among rural-dwelling PWID; assess treatments utilized for injection related SSTIs; and gather data to help reduce the overall risk of injection-related SSTIs.

methodsThirteen questions specific to SSTIs and injection practices were added to a larger study assessing unmet health care needs among PWID and were administered at six syringe exchange programs in rural Wisconsin between May and July 2019. SSTI history prevalence was estimated based on infections reported within one-year prior of response and was compared to self-reported demographics and injection practices.

resultsEighty responses were collected and analyzed. Respondents were white (77.5%), males (60%), between the ages 30 and 39 (42.5%), and have a high school diploma or GED (38.75%). The majority of respondents (77.5%) reported no history of SSTI within the year prior to survey response. Females were over three times more likely to report SSTI history (OR = 3.07, p = 0.038) compared to males. Water sources for drug dilution (p = 0.093) and frequency of injecting on first attempt (p = 0.037), but not proper skin cleaning method (p = 0.378), were significantly associated with a history of SSTI. Injecting into skin (p = 0.038) or muscle (p = 0.001) was significantly associated with a history of SSTI. Injection into veins was not significantly associated with SSTI (p = 0.333).

conclusionHigher-risk injection practices were common among participants reporting a history of SSTIs in this rural sample. Studies exploring socio-demographic factors influencing risky injection practices and general barriers to safer injection practices to prevent SSTIs are warranted. Dissemination of education materials targeting SSTI prevention and intervention among PWID not in treatment is warranted.

Indexed as

Soft Tissue InfectionsSubstance Abuse, IntravenousAdultFemaleHumansMaleNeedle-Exchange ProgramsRural PopulationHeroinInjection drug useMethamphetamineOpioidPeople who inject drugsPublic healthSkin and soft tissue infections

Identifiers

PMID33267848
PMCPMC7709308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.