Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33267800›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020

A novel computational model for predicting potential LncRNA-disease associations based on both direct and indirect features of LncRNA-disease pairs.

Yubin Xiao, Zheng Xiao, Xiang Feng, Zhiping Chen, Linai Kuang, Lei Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yubin XiaoCollege of Computer Engineering and Applied Mathematics, Changsha University, Changsha, 410001, People's Republic of China.
Zheng XiaoHunan Province Key Laboratory of Tumor Cellular and Molecular Pathology, Cancer Research Institute, University of South China, Hengyang, 421001, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Xiang FengCollege of Computer Engineering and Applied Mathematics, Changsha University, Changsha, 410001, People's Republic of China.
Zhiping ChenCollege of Computer Engineering and Applied Mathematics, Changsha University, Changsha, 410001, People's Republic of China.
Linai KuangKey Laboratory of Hunan Province for Internet of Things and Information Security, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, 411105, People's Republic of China.
Lei WangCollege of Computer Engineering and Applied Mathematics, Changsha University, Changsha, 410001, People's Republic of China. wanglei@xtu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5065-8447

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 61873221Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province 2018JJ4058Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province 2019JJ70010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccumulating evidence has demonstrated that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are closely associated with human diseases, and it is useful for the diagnosis and treatment of diseases to get the relationships between lncRNAs and diseases. Due to the high costs and time complexity of traditional bio-experiments, in recent years, more and more computational methods have been proposed by researchers to infer potential lncRNA-disease associations. However, there exist all kinds of limitations in these state-of-the-art prediction methods as well.

resultsIn this manuscript, a novel computational model named FVTLDA is proposed to infer potential lncRNA-disease associations. In FVTLDA, its major novelty lies in the integration of direct and indirect features related to lncRNA-disease associations such as the feature vectors of lncRNA-disease pairs and their corresponding association probability fractions, which guarantees that FVTLDA can be utilized to predict diseases without known related-lncRNAs and lncRNAs without known related-diseases. Moreover, FVTLDA neither relies solely on known lncRNA-disease nor requires any negative samples, which guarantee that it can infer potential lncRNA-disease associations more equitably and effectively than traditional state-of-the-art prediction methods. Additionally, to avoid the limitations of single model prediction techniques, we combine FVTLDA with the Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) and the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) for data analysis respectively. Simulation experiment results show that FVTLDA with MLR can achieve reliable AUCs of 0.8909, 0.8936 and 0.8970 in 5-Fold Cross Validation (fivefold CV), 10-Fold Cross Validation (tenfold CV) and Leave-One-Out Cross Validation (LOOCV), separately, while FVTLDA with ANN can achieve reliable AUCs of 0.8766, 0.8830 and 0.8807 in fivefold CV, tenfold CV, and LOOCV respectively. Furthermore, in case studies of gastric cancer, leukemia and lung cancer, experiment results show that there are 8, 8 and 8 out of top 10 candidate lncRNAs predicted by FVTLDA with MLR, and 8, 7 and 8 out of top 10 candidate lncRNAs predicted by FVTLDA with ANN, having been verified by recent literature. Comparing with the representative prediction model of KATZLDA, comparison results illustrate that FVTLDA with MLR and FVTLDA with ANN can achieve the average case study contrast scores of 0.8429 and 0.8515 respectively, which are both notably higher than the average case study contrast score of 0.6375 achieved by KATZLDA.

conclusionThe simulation results show that FVTLDA has good prediction performance, which is a good supplement to future bioinformatics research.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationComputational BiologyDiseaseHumansNeoplasmsNeural Networks, ComputerRisk FactorsRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, Long NoncodingArtificial neural networkFeaturesLncRNA-disease association predictionMultiple linear regressionRandom walk

Identifiers

PMID33267800
PMCPMC7709313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.