ArticleBMC genomics2020
Characteristics of the completed chloroplast genome sequence of Xanthium spinosum: comparative analyses, identification of mutational hotspots and phylogenetic implications.
Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Complete Chloroplast Genome ofEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of Complete Chloroplast Genomes ofEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Article
- The Complete Chloroplast Genome ofEcology and evolution · 2025Article
- Genome-Wide Development and Characterization of 169 gSSR Markers in the Invasive PlantPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes within Saxifraga sect. Ciliatae: insights into their adaptation to the alpine environment.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparative analysis of complete chloroplast genomes of Synotis species (Asteraceae, Senecioneae) for identification and phylogenetic analysis.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Phylogenetic relationships, selective pressure and molecular markers development of six species in subfamily Polygonoideae based on complete chloroplast genomes.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Chloroplast genome analyses of Caragana arborescens and Caragana opulens.BMC genomic data · 2024Article
- Complete chloroplast genome sequence ofComparative cytogenetics · 2023Article
- Complete Plastome ofGenes · 2022Article
- Article
- Comparative analysis of the complete chloroplast genomes of six threatened subgenus Gynopodium (Magnolia) species.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Article
- Complete Chloroplast Genome Sequence ofGenes · 2022Article
- Comparison of Magnoliaceae Plastomes: Adding NeotropicalPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Extensive reorganization of the chloroplast genome ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Bathurst Burr (Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe invasive species Xanthium spinosum has been used as a traditional Chinese medicine for many years. Unfortunately, no extensive molecular studies of this plant have been conducted.
resultsHere, the complete chloroplast (cp) genome sequence of X. spinosum was assembled and analyzed. The cp genome of X. spinosum was 152,422 base pairs (bp) in length, with a quadripartite circular structure. The cp genome contained 115 unique genes, including 80 PCGs, 31 tRNA genes, and 4 rRNA genes. Comparative analyses revealed that X. spinosum contains a large number of repeats (999 repeats) and 701 SSRs in its cp genome. Fourteen divergences (Π > 0.03) were found in the intergenic spacer regions. Phylogenetic analyses revealed that Parthenium is a sister clade to both Xanthium and Ambrosia and an early-diverging lineage of subtribe Ambrosiinae, although this finding was supported with a very weak bootstrap value.
conclusionThe identified hotspot regions could be used as molecular markers for resolving phylogenetic relationships and species identification in the genus Xanthium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.