Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33267651›Full record

ArticlePsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)2021

Medicaid Expansion and Availability of Opioid Medications in the Specialty Substance Use Disorder Treatment System.

Amanda J Abraham, Courtney R Yarbrough, Samantha J Harris, Grace Bagwell Adams, Christina M Andrews

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amanda J AbrahamDepartment of Public Administration and Policy, School of Public and International Affairs, University of Georgia, Athens (Abraham, Harris); Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta (Yarbrough); Department of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens (Adams); Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia (Andrews).
Courtney R YarbroughDepartment of Public Administration and Policy, School of Public and International Affairs, University of Georgia, Athens (Abraham, Harris); Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta (Yarbrough); Department of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens (Adams); Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia (Andrews).
Samantha J HarrisDepartment of Public Administration and Policy, School of Public and International Affairs, University of Georgia, Athens (Abraham, Harris); Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta (Yarbrough); Department of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens (Adams); Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia (Andrews).
Grace Bagwell AdamsDepartment of Public Administration and Policy, School of Public and International Affairs, University of Georgia, Athens (Abraham, Harris); Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta (Yarbrough); Department of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens (Adams); Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia (Andrews).
Christina M AndrewsDepartment of Public Administration and Policy, School of Public and International Affairs, University of Georgia, Athens (Abraham, Harris); Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta (Yarbrough); Department of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens (Adams); Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia (Andrews).
University of Georgia · US

Funding

Opioid Treatment Adoption in Primary Care Settings: Barriers and Facilitators to ImplementationK01DA051696 · NIDA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI YARBROUGH, COURTNEY R. · 2020 to 2024
$970k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA051696
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveResearch has examined the effect of Medicaid expansion on access to physicians with buprenorphine waivers, but less attention has been paid to Medicaid's impact on opioid use disorder medication availability within the specialty substance use disorder treatment system. To address this gap in the literature, this study examined the impact of Medicaid expansion on availability of opioid medications in specialty programs.

methodsThis study used data from the National Survey of the Substance Abuse Treatment Services (2002-2017), containing all known substance use disorder treatment programs in the United States, to examine the effect of Medicaid expansion on the availability of opioid use disorder medications by treatment program ownership type (publicly owned, private for profit, and private nonprofit) among opioid treatment programs (OTPs) and non-OTPs.

resultsThe effects of Medicaid expansion were limited to nonprofit and for-profit OTPs. Medicaid expansion was associated with 135.1% and 57.5% increases in the number of nonprofit and for-profit OTPs offering injectable naltrexone, respectively, and with a 64.4% increase in the number of nonprofit OTPs offering buprenorphine. Nonprofit and for-profit OTPs compose <10% of the treatment system, indicating that improvements in opioid use disorder treatment associated with Medicaid expansion were limited to a small share of the specialty system.

conclusionsThe limited impact of Medicaid expansion on the specialty treatment system may perpetuate disparities in the accessibility and quality of opioid use disorder treatment for Medicaid enrollees and fail to alleviate high rates of opioid use disorder and opioid overdose deaths in this vulnerable population.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineOpioid-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMedicaidUnited StatesAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineDrug treatmentHealth care reformMedicaid expansionOpioid medicationsProgram ownershipSpecialty substance use disorder treatment system

Identifiers

PMID33267651
PMCPMC8262068
OpenAlexW3107214363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.