Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33267239›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Evaluating Approximations and Heuristic Measures of Integrated Information.

André Sevenius Nilsen, Bjørn Erik Juel, William Marshall

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Upper bounds for integrated information.PLoS computational biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Computing Integrated Information (Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  10. Four-Types of IIT-Induced Group Integrity ofEntropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

André Sevenius NilsenBrain Signalling Group, Department of Physiology, Institute of Basic Medicine, University of Oslo, Sognsvannsveien 9, 0315 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2084-6663
Bjørn Erik JuelBrain Signalling Group, Department of Physiology, Institute of Basic Medicine, University of Oslo, Sognsvannsveien 9, 0315 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0550-581X
William MarshallDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53719, USA.
University of Oslo · NOUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Horizon 2020 7202070Norges Forskningsråd 214079/F20Norges Forskningsråd 262950/F20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrated information theory (IIT) proposes a measure of integrated information, termed Phi (Φ), to capture the level of consciousness of a physical system in a given state. Unfortunately, calculating Φ itself is currently possible only for very small model systems and far from computable for the kinds of system typically associated with consciousness (brains). Here, we considered several proposed heuristic measures and computational approximations, some of which can be applied to larger systems, and tested if they correlate well with Φ. While these measures and approximations capture intuitions underlying IIT and some have had success in practical applications, it has not been shown that they actually quantify the type of integrated information specified by the latest version of IIT and, thus, whether they can be used to test the theory. In this study, we evaluated these approximations and heuristic measures considering how well they estimated the Φ values of model systems and not on the basis of practical or clinical considerations. To do this, we simulated networks consisting of 3-6 binary linear threshold nodes randomly connected with excitatory and inhibitory connections. For each system, we then constructed the system's state transition probability matrix (TPM) and generated observed data over time from all possible initial conditions. We then calculated Φ, approximations to Φ, and measures based on state differentiation, coalition entropy, state uniqueness, and integrated information. Our findings suggest that Φ can be approximated closely in small binary systems by using one or more of the readily available approximations (

Indexed as

complexitycomputationalconsciousnessdifferentiationIITintegrated information theoryintegrationPhi

Identifiers

PMID33267239
PMCPMC7515014
OpenAlexW2944935347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.