ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2019
Transfer Information Assessment in Diagnosis of Vasovagal Syncope Using Transfer Entropy.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The paper presents an application of Transfer Entropy (TE) to the analysis of information transfer between biosignals (heart rate expressed as R-R intervals (RRI), blood pressure (sBP, dBP) and stroke volume (SV)) measured during head up tilt testing (HUTT) in patients with suspected vasovagal syndrome. The study group comprised of 80 patients who were divided into two groups: the HUTT(+) group consisting of 57 patients who developed syncope during the passive phase of the test and HUTT(-) group consisting of 23 patients who had a negative result of the passive phase and experienced syncope after provocation with nitroglycerin. In both groups the information transfer depends on the phase of the tilt test. In supine position the highest transfer occurred between driver RRI and other components. In upright position it is the driver sBP that plays the crucial role. The pre-syncope phase features the highest information transfer from driver SV to blood pressure components. In each group the comparisons of TE between different phases of HUT test showed significant differences for RRI and SV as drivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.