Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33266972›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2019

PID Control as a Process of Active Inference with Linear Generative Models.

Manuel Baltieri, Christopher L Buckley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Five Fristonian Formulae.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Collective behavior from surprise minimization.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Flexible intentions: An Active Inference theory.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Bayesian mechanics for stationary processes.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Manuel BaltieriEASY Group-Sussex Neuroscience, Department of Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6086-4711
Christopher L BuckleyEASY Group-Sussex Neuroscience, Department of Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RH, UK.
University of Sussex · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P022197/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past few decades, probabilistic interpretations of brain functions have become widespread in cognitive science and neuroscience. In particular, the free energy principle and active inference are increasingly popular theories of cognitive functions that claim to offer a unified understanding of life and cognition within a general mathematical framework derived from information and control theory, and statistical mechanics. However, we argue that if the active inference proposal is to be taken as a general process theory for biological systems, it is necessary to understand how it relates to existing control theoretical approaches routinely used to study and explain biological systems. For example, recently, PID (Proportional-Integral-Derivative) control has been shown to be implemented in simple molecular systems and is becoming a popular mechanistic explanation of behaviours such as chemotaxis in bacteria and amoebae, and robust adaptation in biochemical networks. In this work, we will show how PID controllers can fit a more general theory of life and cognition under the principle of (variational) free energy minimisation when using approximate linear generative models of the world. This more general interpretation also provides a new perspective on traditional problems of PID controllers such as parameter tuning as well as the need to balance performances and robustness conditions of a controller. Specifically, we then show how these problems can be understood in terms of the optimisation of the precisions (inverse variances) modulating different prediction errors in the free energy functional.

Indexed as

active inferenceapproximate Bayesian inferencecontrol theorygeneralised state-space modelsinformation theoryPID controlsensorimotor loops

Identifiers

PMID33266972
PMCPMC7514737
OpenAlexW2919878953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.