Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33266678›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Flexibility of Boolean Network Reservoir Computers in Approximating Arbitrary Recursive and Non-Recursive Binary Filters.

Moriah Echlin, Boris Aguilar, Max Notarangelo, David L Gibbs, Ilya Shmulevich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Resonant learning in scale-free networks.PLoS computational biology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. On the Criticality of Adaptive Boolean Network Robots.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Moriah EchlinInstitute for Systems Biology, 401 Terry Ave N, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
Boris AguilarInstitute for Systems Biology, 401 Terry Ave N, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
Max NotarangeloInstitute for Systems Biology, 401 Terry Ave N, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
David L GibbsInstitute for Systems Biology, 401 Terry Ave N, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
Ilya ShmulevichInstitute for Systems Biology, 401 Terry Ave N, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4410-8780

Funding

National Science Foundation DGE-1762114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reservoir computers (RCs) are biology-inspired computational frameworks for signal processing that are typically implemented using recurrent neural networks. Recent work has shown that Boolean networks (BN) can also be used as reservoirs. We analyze the performance of BN RCs, measuring their flexibility and identifying the factors that determine the effective approximation of Boolean functions applied in a sliding-window fashion over a binary signal, both non-recursively and recursively. We train and test BN RCs of different sizes, signal connectivity, and in-degree to approximate three-bit, five-bit, and three-bit recursive binary functions, respectively. We analyze how BN RC parameters and function average sensitivity, which is a measure of function smoothness, affect approximation accuracy as well as the spread of accuracies for a single reservoir. We found that approximation accuracy and reservoir flexibility are highly dependent on RC parameters. Overall, our results indicate that not all reservoirs are equally flexible, and RC instantiation and training can be more efficient if this is taken into account. The optimum range of RC parameters opens up an angle of exploration for understanding how biological systems might be tuned to balance system restraints with processing capacity.

Indexed as

biological modelingBoolean networkscomplex adaptive systemsdynamical systemsmachine learningreservoir computingsignal processingsystems dynamics

Identifiers

PMID33266678
PMCPMC7512538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.