Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33266327›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2020

The Taxon Hypothesis Paradigm-On the Unambiguous Detection and Communication of Taxa.

Urmas Kõljalg, Henrik R Nilsson, Dmitry Schigel, Leho Tedersoo, Karl-Henrik Larsson, Tom W May, Andy F S Taylor, Thomas Stjernegaard Jeppesen, Tobias Guldberg Frøslev, Björn D Lindahl and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 114 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
114citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

114 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Urmas KõljalgNatural History Museum, University of Tartu, 14a Ravila, 50411 Tartu, Estonia.
Henrik R NilssonDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, University of Gothenburg, Box 461, 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden.
Dmitry SchigelGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2919-1168
Leho TedersooInstitute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, 14a Ravila, 50411 Tartu, Estonia.
Karl-Henrik LarssonDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, University of Gothenburg, Box 461, 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden.
Tom W MayRoyal Botanic Gardens Victoria, Birdwood Ave, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2214-4972
Andy F S TaylorThe James Hutton Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, UK.
Thomas Stjernegaard JeppesenGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1691-239X
Tobias Guldberg FrøslevGLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 5-7, 1350 København, Denmark.
Björn D LindahlSystematic Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18D, 75236 Uppsala, Sweden.
Kadri PõldmaaNatural History Museum, University of Tartu, 14a Ravila, 50411 Tartu, Estonia.
Irja SaarInstitute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, 14a Ravila, 50411 Tartu, Estonia.
Ave SuijaNatural History Museum, University of Tartu, 14a Ravila, 50411 Tartu, Estonia.
Anton SavchenkoInstitute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, 14a Ravila, 50411 Tartu, Estonia.
Iryna YatsiukInstitute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, 14a Ravila, 50411 Tartu, Estonia.
Kristjan AdojaanNatural History Museum, University of Tartu, 14a Ravila, 50411 Tartu, Estonia.
Filipp IvanovNatural History Museum, University of Tartu, 14a Ravila, 50411 Tartu, Estonia.
Timo PiirmannNatural History Museum, University of Tartu, 14a Ravila, 50411 Tartu, Estonia.
Raivo PöhönenNatural History Museum, University of Tartu, 14a Ravila, 50411 Tartu, Estonia.
Allan ZirkNatural History Museum, University of Tartu, 14a Ravila, 50411 Tartu, Estonia.
Kessy AbarenkovNatural History Museum, University of Tartu, 14a Ravila, 50411 Tartu, Estonia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here, we describe the taxon hypothesis (TH) paradigm, which covers the construction, identification, and communication of taxa as datasets. Defining taxa as datasets of individuals and their traits will make taxon identification and most importantly communication of taxa precise and reproducible. This will allow datasets with standardized and atomized traits to be used digitally in identification pipelines and communicated through persistent identifiers. Such datasets are particularly useful in the context of formally undescribed or even physically undiscovered species if data such as sequences from samples of environmental DNA (eDNA) are available. Implementing the TH paradigm will to some extent remove the impediment to hastily discover and formally describe all extant species in that the TH paradigm allows discovery and communication of new species and other taxa also in the absence of formal descriptions. The TH datasets can be connected to a taxonomic backbone providing access to the vast information associated with the tree of life. In parallel to the description of the TH paradigm, we demonstrate how it is implemented in the UNITE digital taxon communication system. UNITE TH datasets include rich data on individuals and their rDNA ITS sequences. These datasets are equipped with digital object identifiers (DOI) that serve to fix their identity in our communication. All datasets are also connected to a GBIF taxonomic backbone. Researchers processing their eDNA samples using UNITE datasets will, thus, be able to publish their findings as taxon occurrences in the GBIF data portal. UNITE species hypothesis (species level THs) datasets are increasingly utilized in taxon identification pipelines and even formally undescribed species can be identified and communicated by using UNITE. The TH paradigm seeks to achieve unambiguous, unique, and traceable communication of taxa and their properties at any level of the tree of life. It offers a rapid way to discover and communicate undescribed species in identification pipelines and data portals before they are lost to the sixth mass extinction.

Indexed as

biodiversity informaticsdiscovery of speciesDNA taxonomymetabarcodingmicrobial speciesspecies hypothesestaxon hypothesestaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID33266327
PMCPMC7760934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.