Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33266315›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2020

The Effect of Non-Personalised Tips on the Continued Use of Self-Monitoring mHealth Applications.

Vishnu Unnikrishnan, Miro Schleicher, Yash Shah, Noor Jamaludeen, Ruediger Pryss, Johannes Schobel, Robin Kraft, Winfried Schlee, Myra Spiliopoulou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Tinnitus Measured in Everyday Life: A Literature Review of Ecological Momentary Assessment Studies.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Vishnu UnnikrishnanInstitute of Technical and Business Information Systems, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0086-594X
Miro SchleicherInstitute of Technical and Business Information Systems, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.
Yash ShahInstitute of Technical and Business Information Systems, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.
Noor JamaludeenInstitute of Technical and Business Information Systems, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.
Ruediger PryssInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Würzburg, 97070 Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1522-785X
Johannes SchobelInstitute of Databases and Information Systems, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6874-9478
Robin KraftInstitute of Databases and Information Systems, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0657-3232
Winfried SchleeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Regensburg University, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Myra SpiliopoulouInstitute of Technical and Business Information Systems, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.
Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg · DEUniversität Ulm · DEUniversity of Regensburg · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

European Union Health Programme Joint Action 761307Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme 848261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic tinnitus, the perception of a phantom sound in the absence of corresponding stimulus, is a condition known to affect patients' quality of life. Recent advances in mHealth have enabled patients to maintain a 'disease journal' of ecologically-valid momentary assessments, improving patients' own awareness of their disease while also providing clinicians valuable data for research. In this study, we investigate the effect of non-personalised tips on patients' perception of tinnitus, and on their continued use of the application. The data collected from the study involved three groups of patients that used the app for 16 weeks. Groups A & Y were exposed to feedback from the start of the study, while group B only received tips for the second half of the study. Groups A and Y were run by different supervisors and also differed in the number of hospital visits during the study. Users of Group A and B underwent assessment at baseline, mid-study, post-study and follow-up, while users of group Y were only assessed at baseline and post-study. It is seen that the users in group B use the app for longer, and also more often during the day. The answers of the users to the Ecological Momentary Assessments are seen to form clusters where the degree to which the tinnitus distress depends on tinnitus loudness varies. Additionally, cluster-level models were able to predict new unseen data with better accuracy than a single global model. This strengthens the argument that the discovered clusters really do reflect underlying patterns in disease expression.

Indexed as

ecological momentary assessmentsmHealthnon-personalised tipsphysician feedbackself-monitoringtinnitus

Identifiers

PMID33266315
PMCPMC7760069
OpenAlexW3108267944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.