Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33266049›Full record

ArticleMetabolites2020

Serum Metabolite Biomarkers for Predicting Residual Feed Intake (RFI) of Young Angus Bulls.

Aidin Foroutan, Carolyn Fitzsimmons, Rupasri Mandal, Mark V Berjanskii, David S Wishart

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolites, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Fecal metabolome in Nelore bulls fed pre- and post-feedlot diets.Tropical animal health and production · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Best Practices in NMR Metabolomics: Current State.Trends in analytical chemistry : TRAC · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aidin ForoutanDepartment of Agricultural Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3021-7377
Carolyn FitzsimmonsDepartment of Agricultural Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada.
Rupasri MandalDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada.
Mark V BerjanskiiDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada.
David S WishartDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3207-2434
University of Alberta · CAAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada · CA

Funding

Alberta Livestock and Meat Agency 2012C002RAlberta Livestock and Meat Agency 2014F151RGenome Canada and the Canada Foundation for Innovation Major Science Initiative (CFI-MSI) 35456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Residual feed intake (RFI) is a feed efficiency measure commonly used in the livestock industry to identify animals that efficiently/inefficiently convert feed into meat or body mass. Selection for low-residual feed intake (LRFI), or feed efficient animals, is gaining popularity among beef producers due to the fact that LRFI cattle eat less and produce less methane per unit weight gain. RFI is a difficult and time-consuming measure to perform, and therefore a simple blood test that could distinguish high-RFI (HRFI) from LRFI animals (early on) would potentially benefit beef farmers in terms of optimizing production or selecting which animals to cull or breed. Using three different metabolomics platforms (nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectrometry, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS)) we successfully identified serum biomarkers for RFI that could potentially be translated to an RFI blood test. One set of predictive RFI biomarkers included formate and leucine (best for NMR), and another set included C4 (butyrylcarnitine) and LysoPC(28:0) (best for LC-MS/MS). These serum biomarkers have high sensitivity and specificity (AUROC > 0.85), for distinguishing HRFI from LRFI animals. These results suggest that serum metabolites could be used to inexpensively predict and categorize bovine RFI values. Further validation using a larger, more diverse cohort of cattle is required to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

Angus bullsbiomarkermetaboliteresidual feed intakeserum

Identifiers

PMID33266049
PMCPMC7759889
OpenAlexW3108538230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.