Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33265920›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Antiviral Agents for the Prevention and Treatment of Herpes Simplex Virus Type-1 Infection in Clinical Oncology: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Farah Wasim Aribi Al-Zoobaee, Loo Yee Shen, Sajesh K Veettil, Divya Gopinath, Mari Kannan Maharajan, Rohit Kunnath Menon

Open access · goldAbstract readPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled TrialNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Farah Wasim Aribi Al-ZoobaeeDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur 57000, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-0115-8961
Loo Yee ShenSchool of Pharmacy, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur 57000, Malaysia.
Sajesh K VeettilDepartment of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.
Divya GopinathOral Diagnostics and Surgical Sciences, School of Dentistry, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur 57000, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-4279-7420
Mari Kannan MaharajanSchool of Pharmacy, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur 57000, Malaysia.
Rohit Kunnath MenonDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur 57000, Malaysia.
IMU University · MYUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer therapy may be complicated and compromised by viral infections, including oral herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection. This network meta-analysis aimed to identify the best antiviral agent to prevent or treat oral HSV infection in patients being treated for cancer. A search was conducted for trials published since inception until the 10th of May 2020 in MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. A network meta-analysis was performed on the data from randomized controlled trials that assessed antiviral agents for preventive or therapeutic activity vs. placebo, no treatment or any other active intervention in patients being treated for cancer. The agents were ranked according to their effectiveness in the prevention of oral HSV using surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA). Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) was used to assess the certainty of the evidence. In total, 16 articles were included. The pooled relative risk (RR) to develop oral HSV infection in the acyclovir group was 0.17 (95% CI: 0.10, 0.30), compared to 0.22 (95% CI: 0.06, 0.77) in the valacyclovir group. Acyclovir ranked highest for the prevention of oral HSV followed by valacyclovir. Subgroup analysis with different acyclovir regimens revealed that the best regimens in terms of HSV-1 prevention were 750 mg/m

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsHerpes SimplexHerpesvirus 1, HumanChildDouble-Blind MethodHumansMedical OncologySingle-Blind MethodAntiviral Agentsantiviralcancerherpes simplex virusnetwork meta-analysisprophylaxissystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33265920
PMCPMC7730702
OpenAlexW3106621025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.