Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33265463›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2018

An Efficient Big Data Anonymization Algorithm Based on Chaos and Perturbation Techniques.

Can Eyupoglu, Muhammed Ali Aydin, Abdul Halim Zaim, Ahmet Sertbas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Recent Developments in Privacy-Preserving Mining of Clinical Data.ACM/IMS transactions on data science · 2021
    Article
  4. A Note on the Reproducibility of Chaos Simulation.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Can EyupogluDepartment of Computer Engineering, Istanbul Commerce University, Istanbul 34840, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6133-8617
Muhammed Ali AydinDepartment of Computer Engineering, Istanbul University, Istanbul 34320, Turkey.
Abdul Halim ZaimDepartment of Computer Engineering, Istanbul Commerce University, Istanbul 34840, Turkey.
Ahmet SertbasDepartment of Computer Engineering, Istanbul University, Istanbul 34320, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The topic of big data has attracted increasing interest in recent years. The emergence of big data leads to new difficulties in terms of protection models used for data privacy, which is of necessity for sharing and processing data. Protecting individuals' sensitive information while maintaining the usability of the data set published is the most important challenge in privacy preserving. In this regard, data anonymization methods are utilized in order to protect data against identity disclosure and linking attacks. In this study, a novel data anonymization algorithm based on chaos and perturbation has been proposed for privacy and utility preserving in big data. The performance of the proposed algorithm is evaluated in terms of Kullback-Leibler divergence, probabilistic anonymity, classification accuracy, F-measure and execution time. The experimental results have shown that the proposed algorithm is efficient and performs better in terms of Kullback-Leibler divergence, classification accuracy and F-measure compared to most of the existing algorithms using the same data set. Resulting from applying chaos to perturb data, such successful algorithm is promising to be used in privacy preserving data mining and data publishing.

Indexed as

big datachaosdata anonymizationdata perturbationprivacy preserving

Identifiers

PMID33265463
PMCPMC7512893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.