ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2018
Balancing Non-Equilibrium Driving with Nucleotide Selectivity at Kinetic Checkpoints in Polymerase Fidelity Control.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-enzymatic error correction in self-replicators without extraneous energy supply.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Dissecting nucleotide selectivity in viral RNA polymerases.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Review
- Determining selection free energetics from nucleotide pre-insertion to insertion in viral T7 RNA polymerase transcription fidelity control.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- A Viral T7 RNA Polymerase Ratcheting Along DNA With Fidelity Control.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High fidelity gene transcription and replication require kinetic discrimination of nucleotide substrate species by RNA and DNA polymerases under chemical non-equilibrium conditions. It is known that sufficiently large free energy driving force is needed for each polymerization or elongation cycle to maintain far-from-equilibrium to achieve low error rates. Considering that each cycle consists of multiple kinetic steps with different transition rates, one expects that the kinetic modulations by polymerases are not evenly conducted at each step. We show that accelerations at different kinetic steps impact quite differently to the overall elongation characteristics. In particular, for forward transitions that discriminate cognate and non-cognate nucleotide species to serve as kinetic selection checkpoints, the transition cannot be accelerated too quickly nor retained too slowly to obtain low error rates, as balancing is needed between the nucleotide selectivity and the non-equilibrium driving. Such a balance is not the same as the speed-accuracy tradeoff in which high accuracy is always obtained at sacrifice of speed. For illustration purposes, we used three-state and five-state models of nucleotide addition in the polymerase elongation and show how the non-equilibrium steady state characteristics change upon variations on stepwise forward or backward kinetics. Notably, by using the multi-step elongation schemes and parameters from T7 RNA polymerase transcription elongation, we demonstrate that individual transitions serving as selection checkpoints need to proceed at moderate rates in order to sustain the necessary non-equilibrium drives as well as to allow nucleotide selections for an optimal error control. We also illustrate why rate-limiting conformational transitions of the enzyme likely play a significant role in the error reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.