Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33264611›Full record

ArticleCell reports2020

The Nucleosome Remodeling and Deacetylase Complex Has an Asymmetric, Dynamic, and Modular Architecture.

Jason K K Low, Ana P G Silva, Mehdi Sharifi Tabar, Mario Torrado, Sarah R Webb, Benjamin L Parker, Maryam Sana, Callum Smits, Jason W Schmidberger, Lou Brillault and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Intrinsically Disordered Regions Define Unique Protein Interaction Networks in CHD Family Remodelers.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Jason K K LowSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: jason.low@sydney.edu.au.
Ana P G SilvaSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Mehdi Sharifi TabarSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Mario TorradoSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sarah R WebbSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Benjamin L ParkerSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Maryam SanaSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Callum SmitsSydney, NSW, Australia.
Jason W SchmidbergerSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Lou BrillaultSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, QLD, Australia.
Matthew J JackmanSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, QLD, Australia.
David C WilliamsDept of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Gerd A BlobelThe Division of Hematology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and the Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Sandra B HakeInstitute for Genetics, FB08 Biology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Nicholas E ShepherdSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Michael J LandsbergSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, QLD, Australia. Electronic address: m.landsberg@uq.edu.au.
Joel P MackaySchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: joel.mackay@sydney.edu.au.

Funding

The Role of the MBD2-NuRD Complex in Gamma-Globin Gene SilencingR01DK115563 · NIDDK · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI GINDER, GORDON D, WILLIAMS, DAVID COLLIN · 2018 to 2025
$6.3M
Structural and functional diversity of the methyl-binding domain protein familyR01GM098264 · NIGMS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAMS, DAVID COLLIN · 2012 to 2016
$1.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK115563NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM098264
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase (NuRD) complex is essential for metazoan development but has been refractory to biochemical analysis. We present an integrated analysis of the native mammalian NuRD complex, combining quantitative mass spectrometry, cross-linking, protein biochemistry, and electron microscopy to define the architecture of the complex. NuRD is built from a 2:2:4 (MTA, HDAC, and RBBP) deacetylase module and a 1:1:1 (MBD, GATAD2, and Chromodomain-Helicase-DNA-binding [CHD]) remodeling module, and the complex displays considerable structural dynamics. The enigmatic GATAD2 controls the asymmetry of the complex and directly recruits the CHD remodeler. The MTA-MBD interaction acts as a point of functional switching, with the transcriptional regulator PWWP2A competing with MBD for binding to the MTA-HDAC-RBBP subcomplex. Overall, our data address the long-running controversy over NuRD stoichiometry, provide imaging of the mammalian NuRD complex, and establish the biochemical mechanism by which PWWP2A can regulate NuRD composition.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationHistone DeacetylasesHumansModels, MolecularNucleosomesHistone DeacetylasesNucleosomescross-linking MSDIA-MSelectron microscopyEMgene regulationnucleosome remodelingNuRDPWWP2A

Identifiers

PMID33264611
PMCPMC8908386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.