Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33264578›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of audiology2021

Toward a New Evidence-Based Fitting Paradigm for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids.

Dana Urbanski, Helin Hernandez, Jacob Oleson, Yu-Hsiang Wu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of audiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06499805 (Barriers and Facilitators to OTC Hearing Aids Success), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06499805 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Barriers and Facilitators to OTC Hearing Aids Success

TypeinterventionalSponsorYu-Hsiang WuRan2025 to 2029Enrolled360ConditionsHearing Loss, Sensorineural, PresbycusisArmsAudiologist-based fitting, Over-the-counter fitting
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Effectiveness of a Self-Fitting Tool for User-Driven Fitting of Hearing Aids.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Trial
  3. A novel approach to hearing amplification: audiometric outcomes from Nuance Audio over-the-counter hearing aid glasses.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dana UrbanskiDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Helin HernandezDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Jacob OlesonDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Yu-Hsiang WuDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Google (United States) · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

Cost-effective hearing aid delivery models: Outcomes, value, and candidacyR01DC015997 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Yu-Hsiang Wu · 2018 to 2026
$3.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015997
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose This dual-aim study was intended to develop and validate a new fitting paradigm for over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids. Aim 1 was undertaken to create a limited set of evidence-based preconfigured gain-frequency responses ("presets") for use in OTC devices. Aim 2 tested the efficacy of the presets relative to best-practice verification and determined the best method(s) for older adults to self-select amplification from the set. Method In Aim 1, audiometry data from 267 older adults with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey database. Using these data and the National Acoustic Laboratories-Non-Linear 2 (NAL-NL2) prescriptive formula, a set of four presets were created that can fit a large percentage of older Americans with presbycusis. In Aim 2, 37 older adults with hearing loss used five methods to select presets. The selection methods were select-by-audiogram, select-by-self-test, select-by-trying, select-by-questionnaire, and random assignment. Using a crossover design, each participant completed speech recognition testing and sound quality ratings in quiet and noise for all selection methods and a verified NAL-NL2 condition. Results The set of presets can fit 67.9% of older Americans with mild-to-moderate hearing loss (Aim 1). Controlling for hearing thresholds and sound quality ratings, liner mixed-effects models indicated that speech recognition scores for select-by-audiogram, select-by-self-test, and select-by-trying were not statistically different from the NAL-NL2 condition. Statistical analysis indicated that select-by-self-test produced outcomes most consistent with individual outcomes for the NAL-NL2 condition (Aim 2). Conclusion This newly developed fitting paradigm may provide efficacy comparable to best-practice verification and could be used in OTC hearing aids.

Indexed as

Hearing AidsHearing Loss, SensorineuralSpeech PerceptionAgedHumansNoiseNutrition SurveysProsthesis Fitting

Identifiers

PMID33264578
PMCPMC8632515
OpenAlexW3108502809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.