Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33264391›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2021

NetCoMi: network construction and comparison for microbiome data in R.

Stefanie Peschel, Christian L Müller, Erika von Mutius, Anne-Laure Boulesteix, Martin Depner

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 308 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
308citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
17.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

308 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 541 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Oncoimmunology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

248 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stefanie PeschelInstitute for Asthma and Allergy Prevention, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich, Germany.
Christian L MüllerDepartment of Statistics, LMU München, Munich, Germany.
Erika von MutiusInstitute for Asthma and Allergy Prevention, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich, Germany.
Anne-Laure BoulesteixInstitute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, LMU München, Munich, Germany.
Martin DepnerInstitute for Asthma and Allergy Prevention, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich, Germany.
Helmholtz Zentrum München · DEFlatiron Health (United States) · USLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationEstimating microbial association networks from high-throughput sequencing data is a common exploratory data analysis approach aiming at understanding the complex interplay of microbial communities in their natural habitat. Statistical network estimation workflows comprise several analysis steps, including methods for zero handling, data normalization and computing microbial associations. Since microbial interactions are likely to change between conditions, e.g. between healthy individuals and patients, identifying network differences between groups is often an integral secondary analysis step. Thus far, however, no unifying computational tool is available that facilitates the whole analysis workflow of constructing, analysing and comparing microbial association networks from high-throughput sequencing data.

resultsHere, we introduce NetCoMi (Network Construction and comparison for Microbiome data), an R package that integrates existing methods for each analysis step in a single reproducible computational workflow. The package offers functionality for constructing and analysing single microbial association networks as well as quantifying network differences. This enables insights into whether single taxa, groups of taxa or the overall network structure change between groups. NetCoMi also contains functionality for constructing differential networks, thus allowing to assess whether single pairs of taxa are differentially associated between two groups. Furthermore, NetCoMi facilitates the construction and analysis of dissimilarity networks of microbiome samples, enabling a high-level graphical summary of the heterogeneity of an entire microbiome sample collection. We illustrate NetCoMi's wide applicability using data sets from the GABRIELA study to compare microbial associations in settled dust from children's rooms between samples from two study centers (Ulm and Munich). AVAILABILITY: R scripts used for producing the examples shown in this manuscript are provided as supplementary data. The NetCoMi package, together with a tutorial, is available at https://github.com/stefpeschel/NetCoMi. CONTACT: Tel:+49 89 3187 43258; stefanie.peschel@mail.de. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Briefings in Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Databases, Nucleic AcidHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSoftwareHumansMicrobiotacompositional datadifferential associationmicrobial association estimationnetwork analysisnetwork comparisonsample similarity network

Identifiers

PMID33264391
PMCPMC8293835
OpenAlexW3110476256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.