Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33264323›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Quantitative PCR assays to detect whales, rockfish, and common murre environmental DNA in marine water samples of the Northeastern Pacific.

Elizabeth A Andruszkiewicz, Kevan M Yamahara, Collin J Closek, Alexandria B Boehm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elizabeth A AndruszkiewiczDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9675-0003
Kevan M YamaharaMonterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Moss Landing, California, United States of America.
Collin J ClosekDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4431-221X
Alexandria B BoehmDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8162-5090

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring aquatic species by identification of environmental DNA (eDNA) is becoming more common. To obtain quantitative eDNA datasets for individual species, organism-specific quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays are required. Here, we present detailed methodology of qPCR assay design and testing, including in silico, in vitro, and in vivo testing, and comment on the challenges associated with assay design and performance. We use the presented methodology to design assays for three important marine organisms common in the California Current Ecosystem (CCE): humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae), shortbelly rockfish (Sebastes jordani), and common murre (Uria aalge). All three assays have excellent sensitivity and high efficiencies ranging from 92% to 99%. However, specificities of the assays varied from species-specific in the case of common murre, genus-specific for the shortbelly rockfish assay, and broadly whale-specific for the humpback whale assay, which cross-amplified with other two other whale species, including one in a different family. All assays detected their associated targets in complex environmental water samples.

Indexed as

Biological AssayReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionAnimalsBase SequenceCharadriiformesDNA, EnvironmentalFishesHumpback WhalePacific OceanSeawaterDNA, Environmental

Identifiers

PMID33264323
PMCPMC7710076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.