Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33264300›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Outcomes of isoniazid preventive therapy among people living with HIV in Kenya: A retrospective study of routine health care data.

Muthoni Karanja, Leonard Kingwara, Philip Owiti, Elvis Kirui, Faith Ngari, Richard Kiplimo, Maurice Maina, Enos Masini, Elizabeth Onyango, Catherine Ngugi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Muthoni KaranjaNational AIDS and STI Control Program (NASCOP), Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Leonard KingwaraNational AIDS and STI Control Program (NASCOP), Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0001-6883-267X
Philip OwitiNational Tuberculosis, Leprosy and Lung Disease Program (NTLD-P), Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Elvis KiruiNational Public Health Laboratories, Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Faith NgariNational AIDS and STI Control Program (NASCOP), Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Richard KiplimoNational Tuberculosis, Leprosy and Lung Disease Program (NTLD-P), Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Maurice MainaUnited States Agency for International Development (USAID), Nairobi, Kenya.
Enos MasiniGlobal Fund, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7522-5528
Elizabeth OnyangoNational Tuberculosis, Leprosy and Lung Disease Program (NTLD-P), Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Catherine NgugiNational AIDS and STI Control Program (NASCOP), Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Ministry of Health · KEUnited States Agency for International Development · USGlobal Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIsoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) taken by People Living with HIV (PLHIV) protects against active tuberculosis (TB). Despite its recommendation, data is scarce on the uptake of IPT among PLHIV and factors associated with treatment outcomes. We aimed at determining the proportion of PLHIV initiated on IPT, assessed TB screening practices during and after IPT and IPT treatment outcomes.

methodsA retrospective cohort study of a representative sample of PLHIV initiated on IPT between July 2015 and June 2018 in Kenya. For PLHIV initiated on IPT during the study period, we abstracted patient IPT uptake data from the National data warehouse. In contrast, we obtained information on socio-demographic, TB screening practices, IPT initiation, follow up, and outcomes from health facilities' patient record cards, IPT cards, and IPT registers. Further, we assessed baseline characteristics as potential correlates of developing active TB during and after treatment and IPT completion using multivariable logistic regression.

resultsFrom the data warehouse, 138,442 PLHIV were enrolled into ART during the study period and initiated 95,431 (68.9%) into IPT. We abstracted 4708 patients' files initiated on IPT, out of which 3891(82.6%) had IPT treatment outcomes documented, 4356(92.5%) had ever screened for TB at every clinic visit, and 4,243(90.1%) had documentation of TB screening on the IPT tool before IPT initiation. 3712(95.4%) of patients with documented IPT treatment outcomes completed their treatment. 42(0.89%) of the abstracted patients developed active TB,16(38.1%) during, and 26(61.9%) after completing IPT. Follow up for active TB at 6-month post-IPT completion was done for 2729(73.5%) of patients with IPT treatment outcomes. Sex, Viral load suppression, and clinic type were associated with TB development (p<0.05). Levels 4, 5, FBO, and private facilities and IPT prescription practices were associated with IPT completion (p<0.05).

conclusionIPT initiation stands at two-thirds of the PLHIV, with a high completion rate. TB screening practices were better during IPT than after completion. Development of active TB during and after IPT emphasizes the need for a keen follow up.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAIDS-Related Opportunistic InfectionsAmbulatory Care FacilitiesAnti-HIV AgentsAntitubercular AgentsChildChild, PreschoolElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansImmunocompromised HostInfantAnti-HIV AgentsAntitubercular AgentsIsoniazid

Identifiers

PMID33264300
PMCPMC7710039
OpenAlexW3108862854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.