ArticlePloS one2020
An automated homecage system for multiwhisker detection and discrimination learning in mice.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association learning drives synaptic plasticity at feedforward synapses in somatosensory cortex.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026Article
- The Training Village: an open platform for continuous testing of rodents in cognitive tasks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Sexually dimorphic plasticity of PV inhibition in sensory neocortex during learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Long-lasting, subtype-specific regulation of somatostatin interneurons during sensory learning.Science advances · 2025Article
- Somatostatin neurons detect stimulus-reward contingencies to reduce neocortical inhibition during learning.Cell reports · 2025Article
- Automated head-fixation training system with high levels of animal participation in psychoacoustic tasks.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
- Transient enhancement of stimulus-evoked activity in neocortex during sensory learning.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Quantitative Fluorescence Analysis Reveals Dendrite-Specific Thalamocortical Plasticity in L5 Pyramidal Neurons during Learning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Fully desktop fabricated flexible graphene electrocorticography (ECoG) arrays.Journal of neural engineering · 2023Article
- Refinements to rodent head fixation and fluid/food control for neuroscience.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2022Review
- A novel stimulator to investigate the tuning of multi-whisker responsive neurons for speed and the direction of global motion: Contact-sensitive moving stimulator for multi-whisker stimulation.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2022Article
- FosGFP expression does not capture a sensory learning-related engram in superficial layers of mouse barrel cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Automated, homecage behavioral training for rodents has many advantages: it is low stress, requires little interaction with the experimenter, and can be easily manipulated to adapt to different experimental conditions. We have developed an inexpensive, Arduino-based, homecage training apparatus for sensory association training in freely-moving mice using multiwhisker air current stimulation coupled to a water reward. Animals learn this task readily, within 1-2 days of training, and performance progressively improves with training. We examined the parameters that regulate task acquisition using different stimulus intensities, directions, and reward valence. Learning was assessed by comparing anticipatory licking for the stimulus compared to the no-stimulus (blank) trials. At high stimulus intensities (>9 psi), animals showed markedly less participation in the task. Conversely, very weak air current intensities (1-2 psi) were not sufficient to generate rapid learning behavior. At intermediate stimulus intensities (5-6 psi), a majority of mice learned that the multiwhisker stimulus predicted the water reward after 24-48 hrs of training. Both exposure to isoflurane and lack of whiskers decreased animals' ability to learn the task. Following training at an intermediate stimulus intensity, mice were able to transfer learning behavior when exposed to a lower stimulus intensity, an indicator of perceptual learning. Mice learned to discriminate between two directions of stimulation rapidly and accurately, even when the angular distance between the stimuli was <15 degrees. Switching the reward to a more desirable reward, aspartame, had little effect on learning trajectory. Our results show that a tactile association task in an automated homecage environment can be monitored by anticipatory licking to reveal rapid and progressive behavioral change. These Arduino-based, automated mouse cages enable high-throughput training that facilitate analysis of large numbers of genetically modified mice with targeted manipulations of neural activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.