Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33264086›Full record

ArticleWomen's health (London, England)

Knowledge and perceptions regarding triage among human papillomavirus-tested women: A qualitative study of perspectives of low-income women in Argentina.

Sánchez Antelo Victoria, Kohler Racquel E, Szwarc Lucila, Paolino Melisa, Kasisomayajula Viswanath, Arrossi Silvina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sánchez Antelo VictoriaCentro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-4892-0394
Kohler Racquel ECancer Health Equity, Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers-The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Szwarc LucilaCentro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad/Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Paolino MelisaCentro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad/Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Kasisomayajula ViswanathDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
Arrossi SilvinaCentro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad/Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Funding

Mixed-Methods approach to evaluate a mHealth intervention to increase adherence to triage of HPV+ women who have performed self-collectionR01CA218306 · NCI · CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF STATE / SOCIETY · PI ARROSSI, SILVINA · 2017 to 2019
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA218306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAmong cancer prevention studies, little is known about knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs toward triage adherence in the context of the human papillomavirus self-collection test. This formative research aims to identify knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs related to human papillomavirus and cervical cancer prevention specifically about adherence to Pap triage among women residing in a low-income province in Argentina.

methodsWe conducted six focus groups, stratified by residence and age. All participants were aged 30 or older and had performed human papillomavirus self-collection. Data collection and thematic analysis were carried out using constructs from the Health Belief Model.

resultsMisinformation regarding human papillomavirus and cervical cancer was common and was a source of distress. Women could not distinguish Pap screening from triage; human papillomavirus risk perception was limited but cervical cancer was perceived as a threatening disease. Women were willing to follow-up after receiving an abnormal screening result. Negative views about clinician-collected screening/triage were common, defined as painful and shameful, and comes with an economic cost (transport/time). Lack of help from family/friends was an obstacle to adhering to triage. Health issues in the family's records and a physician's recommendation were a cue to adhere to triage.

conclusionLack of knowledge or misinformation of the causes of cervical cancer, human papillomavirus, and the multi-step screening and triage process are barriers to follow-up adherence. Interventions to improve communication between women and health providers about screening results and follow-up are needed. Also, health services should be organized to respond to women's needs and reduce access barriers to follow-up.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePovertyTriageAdultArgentinaFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMiddle AgedPapillomavirus InfectionsPatient Acceptance of Health CareQualitative ResearchUterine Cervical NeoplasmsArgentinacervical cancerHealth Belief Modelhuman papillomavirus self-collection testPap smear triage

Identifiers

PMID33264086
PMCPMC7716054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.