Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33263924›Full record

ArticleNeurology and therapy2021

Parent Experiences of Sanfilippo Syndrome Impact and Unmet Treatment Needs: A Qualitative Assessment.

Katherine Ackerman Porter, Cara O'Neill, Elise Drake, Samantha Parker, Maria L Escolar, Stacey Montgomery, William Moon, Carolyn Worrall, Holly L Peay

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine Ackerman PorterCenter for Genomics, Bioinformatics, and Translational Research, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. kmporter@rti.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5544-8369
Cara O'NeillCure Sanfilippo Foundation, Columbia, SC, USA.
Elise DrakeCure Sanfilippo Foundation, Columbia, SC, USA.
Samantha ParkerPatient and Policy Affairs, Lysogene, Neuilly sur Seine, France.
Maria L EscolarUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Stacey MontgomeryCure Sanfilippo Foundation Parent Advocates, Columbia, SC, USA.
William MoonCure Sanfilippo Foundation Parent Advocates, Columbia, SC, USA.
Carolyn WorrallCure Sanfilippo Foundation Parent Advocates, Columbia, SC, USA.
Holly L PeayCenter for Genomics, Bioinformatics, and Translational Research, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
RTI International · USChildren's Hospital of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSanfilippo syndrome (MPS III) is a rare, degenerative condition characterized by symptoms impacting cognitive ability, mobility, behavior, and quality of life. Currently there are no approved therapies for this severe life-limiting disease. Integrating patient and caregiver experience data into drug development and regulatory decision-making has become a priority of the Food and Drug Administration and rare disease patient communities.

methodsThis study assesses parents' perceptions of their child's Sanfilippo syndrome disease-related symptoms using a research approach that is consistent with the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) guidance. This study was initiated by the Cure Sanfilippo Foundation, and all steps in the research process were informed by a multidisciplinary advisory committee, with an objective of informing biopharmaceutical companies and regulatory agencies. We explored caregiver burden, symptoms with greatest impact, and meaningful but unmet treatment needs. Data were collected from 25 parents through three focus groups and a questionnaire. Transcripts were coded and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis, and descriptive analysis of quantitative data was conducted.

resultsParticipating parents' children ranged in age from 4 to 36 years. Participants endorsed high caregiving burden across all stages of the disease. Analysis revealed multiple domains of unmet need that impact child and family quality of life, including cognitive-behavioral challenges in communication, relationships, behavior, anxiety, and child safety; and physical health symptoms including sleep, pain, and mobility. Participants reported placing high value on incremental benefits targeting those symptoms, and on a treatment that would slow or stop symptom progression.

conclusionEven modest treatment benefits for Sanfilippo syndrome were shown to be highly valued. Despite high caregiver burden, most parents expressed a willingness to "try anything," including treatments with potentially high risk profiles, to maintain their child's current state.

Indexed as

Meaningful treatment benefitMPSOutcome measurePatient experience dataPatient-focused drug developmentSanfilippo syndrome

Identifiers

PMID33263924
PMCPMC8139994
OpenAlexW3107281296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.