Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33263865›Full record

Observational studyJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2021

Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer initiating first-line treatment in the US community oncology setting: a real-world retrospective observational study.

Eric Nadler, Bhakti Arondekar, Kathleen Marie Aguilar, Jie Zhou, Jane Chang, Xinke Zhang, Vivek Pawar

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A Bioimaging Study ofMolecular imaging and biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Eric NadlerTexas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Bhakti ArondekarPfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA.
Kathleen Marie AguilarMcKesson Life Sciences, 10100101 Woodloch Forest Dr, The Woodlands, TX, USA. kat.aguilar@mckesson.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2467-8663
Jie ZhouMcKesson Life Sciences, 10100101 Woodloch Forest Dr, The Woodlands, TX, USA.
Jane ChangPfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA.
Xinke ZhangEMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc., Billerica, MA, USA; an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, Billerica, MA, USA.
Vivek PawarEMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc., Billerica, MA, USA; an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, Billerica, MA, USA.
McKesson (United States) · USMerck (Germany) · DEPfizer (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTreatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have evolved to include targeted and immuno-oncology therapies, which have demonstrated clinical benefits in clinical trials. However, few real-world studies have evaluated these treatments in the first-line setting.

methodsAdult patients with advanced NSCLC who initiated first-line treatment with chemotherapy, targeted therapies (TT), or immuno-oncology-based regimens in the US Oncology Network (USON) between March 1, 2015, and August 1, 2018, were included and followed up through February 1, 2019. Data were sourced from structured fields of USON electronic health records. Patient and treatment characteristics were assessed descriptively, with Kaplan-Meier methods used to evaluate time-to-event outcomes, including time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival (OS). Adjusted Cox regression analyses and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were performed to control for covariates that may have affected treatment selection and outcomes.

resultsOf 7746 patients, 75.6% received first-line systemic chemotherapy, 11.7% received immuno-oncology monotherapies, 8.5% received TT, and 4.2% received immuno-oncology combination regimens. Patients who received immuno-oncology monotherapies had the longest median TTD (3.5 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8-4.2) and OS (19.9 months; 95% CI, 16.6-24.1). On the basis of multivariable Cox regression and IPTW, immuno-oncology monotherapy was associated with reduced risk of death and treatment discontinuation relative to other treatments.

conclusionThese results suggest that real-world outcomes in this community oncology setting improved with the introduction of immuno-oncology therapies. However, clinical benefits are limited in certain subgroups and tend to be reduced compared with clinical trial observations.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleHumansImmunotherapyKaplan-Meier EstimateLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Targeted TherapyRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCommunity oncologyElectronic health recordImmuno-oncologyOverall survivalTime to treatment discontinuation

Identifiers

PMID33263865
PMCPMC7873014
OpenAlexW3109815375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.