Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33263789›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2021

Borderline personality disorder classification based on brain network measures during emotion regulation.

Henk Cremers, Linda van Zutphen, Sascha Duken, Gregor Domes, Andreas Sprenger, Lourens Waldorp, Arnoud Arntz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Borderline Personality Disorder: Updates in a Postpandemic World.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Henk CremersDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129B, 1001 NK, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. h.r.cremers@uva.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8555-8158
Linda van ZutphenDepartment of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Sascha DukenDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129B, 1001 NK, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gregor DomesDepartment of Biological and Clinical Psychology, University of Trier, Trier, Germany.
Andreas SprengerDepartment of Neurology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Lourens WaldorpDepartment of Psychological Methods, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Arnoud ArntzDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129B, 1001 NK, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

German Research Foundation JA1785/3-1NWO 464-10-080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is characterized by an increased emotional sensitivity and dysfunctional capacity to regulate emotions. While amygdala and prefrontal cortex interactions are regarded as the critical neural mechanisms underlying these problems, the empirical evidence hereof is inconsistent. In the current study, we aimed to systematically test different properties of brain connectivity and evaluate the predictive power to detect borderline personality disorder. Patients with borderline personality disorder (n = 51), cluster C personality disorder (n = 26) and non-patient controls (n = 44), performed an fMRI emotion regulation task. Brain network analyses focused on two properties of task-related connectivity: phasic refers to task-event dependent changes in connectivity, while tonic was defined as task-stable background connectivity. Three different network measures were estimated (strength, local efficiency, and participation coefficient) and entered as separate models in a nested cross-validated linear support vector machine classification analysis. Borderline personality disorder vs. non-patient controls classification showed a balanced accuracy of 55%, which was not significant under a permutation null-model, p = 0.23. Exploratory analyses did indicate that the tonic strength model was the highest performing model (balanced accuracy 62%), and the amygdala was one of the most important features. Despite being one of the largest data-sets in the field of BPD fMRI research, the sample size may have been limited for this type of classification analysis. The results and analytic procedures do provide starting points for future research, focusing on network measures of tonic connectivity, and potentially focusing on subgroups of BPD.

Indexed as

Borderline Personality DisorderBrainEmotional RegulationCase-Control StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingBorderline personality disorderClassificationMachine learningNetwork measuresNetworks analysisPhasic vs. tonic brain connectivity

Identifiers

PMID33263789
PMCPMC8354902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.