Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33263787›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2021

Demand for integrative medicine among women with breast and gynecological cancer: a multicenter cross-sectional study in Southern and Northern Germany.

Donata Grimm, Sofia Mathes, Linn Woelber, Caroline Van Aken, Barbara Schmalfeldt, Volkmar Mueller, Marion Kiechle, Christine Brambs, Daniela Paepke

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Donata GrimmDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. donatakatharina.grimm@uksh.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4706-2335
Sofia MathesDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich, Germany.
Linn WoelberDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Caroline Van AkenDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Barbara SchmalfeldtDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Volkmar MuellerDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Marion KiechleDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich, Germany.
Christine BrambsDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich, Germany.
Daniela PaepkeDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this multicenter cross-sectional study was to analyze a cohort of breast (BC) and gynecological cancer (GC) patients regarding their interest in, perception of and demand for integrative therapeutic health approaches.

methodsBC and GC patients were surveyed at their first integrative clinic visit using validated standardized questionnaires. Treatment goals and potential differences between the two groups were evaluated.

results340 patients (272 BC, 68 GC) participated in the study. The overall interest in IM was 95.3% and correlated with older age, recent chemotherapy, and higher education. A total of 89.4% were using integrative methods at the time of enrolment, primarily exercise therapy (57.5%), and vitamin supplementation (51.4%). The major short-term goal of the BC patients was a side-effects reduction of conventional therapy (70.4%); the major long-term goal was the delay of a potential tumor progression (69.3%). In the GC group, major short-term and long-term goals were slowing tumor progression (73.1% and 79.1%) and prolonging survival (70.1% and 80.6%). GC patients were significantly more impaired by the side-effects of conventional treatment than BC patients [pain (p = 0.006), obstipation (< 0.005)].

conclusionOur data demonstrate a high overall interest in and use of IM in BC and GC patients. This supports the need for specialized IM counseling and the implementation of integrative treatments into conventional oncological treatment regimes in both patient groups. Primary tumor site, cancer diagnosis, treatment phase, and side effects had a relevant impact on the demand for IM in our study population.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGenital Neoplasms, FemaleGermanyHumansIntegrative MedicineMiddle AgedYoung AdultAttitude of cancer patientsBreast cancerComplementary and alternative medicine (CAM)Gynecologic oncologyIntegrative medicine (IM)Supportive care in cancerUser behavior

Identifiers

PMID33263787
PMCPMC8053147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.