ArticleThe journal of spinal cord medicine2022
Preliminary validation study of the WHO quality of life (WHOQOL) scales for people with spinal cord injury in Mainland China.
Article in The journal of spinal cord medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06587841 (Noninvasive Spinal Cord Neuromodulation to Improve Lower Urinary Tract Function After Spinal Cord Injury in Ukrainian War Veterans), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Noninvasive Spinal Cord Neuromodulation to Improve Lower Urinary Tract Function After Spinal Cord Injury in Ukrainian War Veterans
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Self-efficacy and quality of life mediate self-reported mental health outcomes in visual snow syndrome.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Validation of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13) among individuals with chronic spinal cord injury in mainland China.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2026Article
- Efficacy of family centered empowerment model of support on care burden in family caregivers of patients with prostate cancer.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- The impact of nurse-led, AI-assisted perioperative health education on psychological status and quality of life in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Validation study of the Chinese version of the Community Integration Questionnaire-Revised for individuals with spinal cord injury in Mainland China.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2024Article
- Psychological Well-Being of Young Athletes with Physical Disabilities: A Systematic Review.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
- Effects of WeChat follow-up management on the psychological distress, care burden, and quality of life of parents of infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- The Influence of Music Therapy on the Mood State and Hope Level of Patients with Leukemia Complicated with Anxiety Disorder.Noise & healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo validate the WHOQOL Scales (WHOQOL-BREF and WHOQOL-DIS module) for people with spinal cord injury in Mainland China.
designCross-sectional study.
settingShanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center.
participants249 adults with SCI who were admitted to a rehabilitation training program between 2017 and 2019.
interventionsNot applicable.
methodsQuestionnaires about personal and injury characteristics, the WHOQOL Scales, global QOL, Zung Self-Rating Anxiety/Depression Scale (SAS/SDS), and Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) were administrated. Floor and ceiling effects, reliability, and validity analyses were tested.
resultsThe 8 domains of the WHOQOL Scales showed no floor or ceiling effects. Cronbach alpha values of the WHOQOL-BREF and the WHOQOL-DIS were 0.93 and 0.78, respectively. Test-retest reliability was good for the WHOQOL Scales. Satisfactory criterion-related validity was shown by the correlation analysis among the WHOQOL Scales, SAS/SDS, CIQ, and global QOL. Good item-domain correlations (>0.50) were found for 38 items of the 39-item WHOQOL Scales, excepting the "impact of disability" (0.48) of the WHOQOL-DIS. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) supported a construct of the WHOQOL-DIS as made of four domains: autonomy, social inclusion, social activities, and discrimination. CFI and RMSEA values were 0.91 and 0.07, respectively, for the four-domain structure WHOQOL-DIS, with a higher-order factor. WHOQOL-BREF domains and WHOQOL-DIS scores showed the predicted pattern among
conclusionThe WHOQOL Scales are valid and reliable, and they can be used to measure QOL in people with SCI in China. We suggest the WHOQOL-DIS be analyzed as one general item constituting a single 12-item domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.