Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33263357›Full record

ArticleAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2021

Emergency Physicians and Personal Narratives Improve the Perceived Effectiveness of COVID-19 Public Health Recommendations on Social Media: A Randomized Experiment.

Rachel E Solnick, Grace Chao, Ryan D Ross, Gordon T Kraft-Todd, Keith E Kocher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Communicating and complying with COVID-19 actions in northernmost Finland.International journal of circumpolar health · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rachel E SolnickFrom the, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, U-M National Clinical Scholars Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2565-5690
Grace ChaoFrom the, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, U-M National Clinical Scholars Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3133-9827
Ryan D Rossand the, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9316-5810
Gordon T Kraft-Toddand the, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1220-9269
Keith E Kocherthe, Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

National Clinical Scholars Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContainment of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic requires the public to change behavior under social distancing mandates. Social media are important information dissemination platforms that can augment traditional channels communicating public health recommendations. The objective of the study was to assess the effectiveness of COVID-19 public health messaging on Twitter when delivered by emergency physicians and containing personal narratives.

methodsOn April 30, 2020, we randomly assigned 2,007 U.S. adults to an online survey using a 2 × 2 factorial design. Participants rated one of four simulated Twitter posts varied by messenger type (emergency physician vs. federal official) and content (personal narrative vs. impersonal guidance). The main outcomes were perceived message effectiveness (35-point scale), perceived attitude effectiveness (PAE; 15-point scale), likelihood of sharing Tweets (7-point scale), and writing a letter to their governor to continue COVID-19 restrictions (write letter or none).

resultsThe physician/personal (PP) message had the strongest effect and significantly improved all main messaging outcomes except for letter writing. Unadjusted mean differences between PP and federal/impersonal (FI) were as follows: perceived messaging effectiveness (3.2 [95% CI = 2.4 to 4.0]), PAE (1.3 [95% CI = 0.8 to 1.7]), and likelihood of sharing (0.4 [95% CI = 0.15 to 0.7]). For letter writing, PP made no significant impact compared to FI (odds ratio = 1.14 [95% CI = 0.89 to 1.46]).

conclusionsEmergency physicians sharing personal narratives on Twitter are perceived to be more effective at communicating COVID-19 health recommendations compared to federal officials sharing impersonal guidance.

Indexed as

CommunicationCOVID-19PhysiciansPublic HealthSocial MediaAdultHumansInformation DisseminationPersonal Narratives as TopicUnited States

Identifiers

PMID33263357
PMCPMC7753341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.