Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33263283›Full record

ArticleeLife2020

Layer 6 ensembles can selectively regulate the behavioral impact and layer-specific representation of sensory deviants.

Jakob Voigts, Christopher A Deister, Christopher I Moore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Deviance detection via competitive inhibition between local neocortical ensembles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Synaptic Properties of Layer 6 Auditory Corticothalamic Inputs in Normal Hearing and Noise-Induced Hearing Loss.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. The Somatosensory Mismatch Negativity.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  11. Layer 6 Corticothalamic Neurons Induce High Gamma Oscillations Through Cortico-cortical and Cortico-thalamo-cortical Pathways.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Layer 6 is a hub for cholinergic modulation in the mouse auditory cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Motor Control of Distinct Layer 6 Corticothalamic Feedback Circuits.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jakob VoigtsDepartment of Neuroscience and Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5174-7214
Christopher A DeisterDepartment of Neuroscience and Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9579-918X
Christopher I MooreDepartment of Neuroscience and Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4534-1602

Funding

Systematic in vivo Testing of the Fast-Spiking Synchrony HypothesisR01NS045130 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MOORE, CHRISTOPHER I · 2003 to 2017
$3.5M
Systematic Testing of a Neocortical Gamma Gain HypothesisF32MH100749 · NIMH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI DEISTER, CHRISTOPHER ALLEN · 2013 to 2015
$165k
NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH100749NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS045130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predictive models can enhance the salience of unanticipated input. Here, we tested a key potential node in neocortical model formation in this process, layer (L) 6, using behavioral, electrophysiological and imaging methods in mouse primary somatosensory neocortex. We found that deviant stimuli enhanced tactile detection and were encoded in L2/3 neural tuning. To test the contribution of L6, we applied weak optogenetic drive that changed which L6 neurons were sensory responsive, without affecting overall firing rates in L6 or L2/3. This stimulation selectively suppressed behavioral sensitivity to deviant stimuli, without impacting baseline performance. This stimulation also eliminated deviance encoding in L2/3 but did not impair basic stimulus responses across layers. In contrast, stronger L6 drive inhibited firing and suppressed overall sensory function. These findings indicate that, despite their sparse activity, specific ensembles of stimulus-driven L6 neurons are required to form neocortical predictions, and to realize their behavioral benefit.

Indexed as

AnimalsFemaleMaleMiceNeocortexSensationSomatosensory Cortexcortexdeviantlayer 6mouseneuroscienceoddballpredictionvibrissa

Identifiers

PMID33263283
PMCPMC7817180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.