ArticleJournal of digital imaging2021
Generalized Radiographic View Identification with Deep Learning.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning models for radiography body-part classification and chest radiograph projection/orientation classification: a multi-institutional study.European radiology · 2026Article
- A Computer Vision and Machine Learning Approach to Classify Views in Distal Radius Radiographs.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025Article
- Deep Learning-Based Estimation of Radiographic Position to Automatically Set Up the X-Ray Prime Factors.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Improved Automated Quality Control of Skeletal Wrist Radiographs Using Deep Multitask Learning.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Assessment of X-ray ankle joint image projection correctness with the use of machine learning algorithms.Polish journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Reducing the number of unnecessary biopsies for mammographic BI-RADS 4 lesions through a deep transfer learning method.BMC medical imaging · 2023Article
- Classification of racehorse limb radiographs using deep convolutional neural networks.Veterinary record open · 2023Article
- Toward automatic reformation at the orbitomeatal line in head computed tomography using object detection algorithm.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2022Article
- Determining the anatomical site in knee radiographs using deep learning.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- A deep-learning method using computed tomography scout images for estimating patient body weight.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To explore the feasibility of an automatic machine-learning algorithm-based quality control system for the practice of diagnostic radiography, performance of a convolutional neural networks (CNN)-based algorithm for identifying radiographic (X-ray) views at different levels was examined with a retrospective, HIPAA-compliant, and IRB-approved study performed on 15,046 radiographic images acquired between 2013 and 2018 from nine clinical sites affiliated with our institution. Images were labeled according to four classification levels: level 1 (anatomy level, 25 classes), level 2 (laterality level, 41 classes), level 3 (projection level, 108 classes), and level 4 (detailed level, 143 classes). An Inception V3 model pre-trained with ImageNet dataset was trained with transfer learning to classify the image at all levels. Sensitivity and positive predictive value were reported for each class, and overall accuracy was reported for each level. Accuracy was also reported when we allowed for "reasonable errors". The overall accuracy was 0.96, 0.93, 0.90, and 0.86 at levels 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Overall accuracy increased to 0.99, 0.97, 0.94, and 0.88 when "reasonable errors" were allowed. Machine learning algorithms resulted in reasonable model performance for identifying radiographic views with acceptable accuracy when "reasonable errors" were allowed. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of building a quality-control program based on machine-learning algorithms to identify radiographic views with acceptable accuracy at lower levels, which could be applied in a clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.