Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33263102›Full record

ArticleSN comprehensive clinical medicine2020

The Flood of COVID-19 Publications: a Word of Caution.

Punit Tiwari, Harmeet Kaur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SN comprehensive clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Punit TiwariDepartment of Orthopaedics, Maharishi Markandeshwar Medical College and Hospital, Kumarhatti, Solan, Himachal Pradesh India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4174-8344
Harmeet KaurDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Punjab India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7962-8463

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The entire world is currently experiencing difficult times with respect to physical, mental, and socio-economic health. The rapid spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) since early 2020 caught the world by surprise. While there are promising developments, to date, there is no available drug or vaccine, and researchers are working around the clock to develop a solution. Sadly, all these crucial efforts are being affected and, at times, misguided and derailed by the publication of fake articles by so-called researchers and perhaps the mismanagement by authentic and predatory journals. The problem is that genuine and good quality articles are getting lost in the crowd. More than ever, it is now the time to bring in stricter controls and to follow due diligence before allowing articles into the public domain. At the same time, it has become life-saving to separate the wheat from the chaff so that the genuine studies of first-hand experience of handling and management of COVID-19 patients, and authentic research is not submerged in this flood of unreliable publications.

Indexed as

COVID-19Fake researchSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33263102
PMCPMC7694586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.