Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33263050›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2020

Treatable traits qualifying for nonpharmacological interventions in COPD patients upon first referral to a pulmonologist: the COPD sTRAITosphere.

Alex J van 't Hul, Eleonore H Koolen, Jeanine C Antons, Marianne de Man, Remco S Djamin, Johannes C C M In 't Veen, Sami O Simons, Michel van den Heuvel, Bram van den Borst, Martijn A Spruit

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Does pulmonary rehabilitation address treatable traits? A systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Alex J van 't HulRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Dept of Respiratory Diseases, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5514-2327
Eleonore H KoolenRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Dept of Respiratory Diseases, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jeanine C AntonsRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Dept of Respiratory Diseases, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marianne de ManBernhoven, Dept of Respiratory Diseases, Uden, The Netherlands.
Remco S DjaminDept of Respiratory Diseases, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
Johannes C C M In 't VeenDept of Respiratory Diseases, STZ Centre of Excellence for Asthma & COPD, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sami O SimonsDept of Respiratory Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Michel van den HeuvelRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Dept of Respiratory Diseases, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Bram van den BorstRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Dept of Respiratory Diseases, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Martijn A SpruitDept of Respiratory Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3822-7430
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLAmphia Ziekenhuis · NLSint Franciscus Gasthuis · NLZiekenhuis Bernhoven · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe present study assessed the prevalence of nine treatable traits (TTs) pinpointing nonpharmacological interventions in patients with COPD upon first referral to a pulmonologist, how these TTs co-occurred and whether and to what extent the TTs increased the odds having a severely impaired health status.

methodsData were collected from a sample of 402 COPD patients. A second sample of 381 patients with COPD was used for validation. Nine TTs were assessed: current smoking status, activity-related dyspnoea, frequent exacerbations <12 months, severe fatigue, depressed mood, poor physical capacity, low physical activity, poor nutritional status and a low level of self-management activation. For each TT the odds ratio (OR) of having a severe health status impairment was calculated. Furthermore, a graphic representation was created, the COPD sTRAITosphere, to visualise TTs prevalence and OR.

resultsOn average 3.9±2.0 TTs per patient were observed. These TTs occurred relatively independently of each other and coexisted in 151 unique combinations. A significant positive correlation was found between the number of TTs and Clinical COPD Questionnaire total score (r=0.58; p<0.001). Patients with severe fatigue (OR: 8.8), severe activity-related dyspnoea (OR: 5.8) or depressed mood (OR: 4.2) had the highest likelihood of having a severely impaired health status. The validation sample corroborated these findings.

conclusionsUpon first referral to a pulmonologist, COPD patients show multiple TTs indicating them to several nonpharmacological interventions. These TTs coexist in many different combinations, are relatively independent and increase the likelihood of having a severely impaired health status.

Identifiers

PMID33263050
PMCPMC7682701
OpenAlexW3093138800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.