Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33263021›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2020

Use of the ReCIVA device in breath sampling of patients with acute breathlessness: a feasibility study.

Karl A Holden, Wadah Ibrahim, Dahlia Salman, Rebecca Cordell, Teresa McNally, Bharti Patel, Rachael Phillips, Caroline Beardsmore, Michael Wilde, Luke Bryant and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Targeting the epithelium in pulmonary fibrosis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Karl A HoldenNIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (Respiratory Theme), Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1420-8959
Wadah IbrahimNIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (Respiratory Theme), Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Dahlia SalmanLoughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
Rebecca CordellDept of Chemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Teresa McNallyNIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (Respiratory Theme), Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Bharti PatelNIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (Respiratory Theme), Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Rachael PhillipsNIHR Leicester Clinical Research Facility, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK.
Caroline BeardsmoreNIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (Respiratory Theme), Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Michael WildeDept of Chemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Luke BryantDept of Chemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Amisha SingapuriNIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (Respiratory Theme), Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Paul MonksDept of Chemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Chris BrightlingNIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (Respiratory Theme), Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Neil GreeningNIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (Respiratory Theme), Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Paul ThomasNIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (Respiratory Theme), Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Salman SiddiquiNIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (Respiratory Theme), Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Erol A GaillardNIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (Respiratory Theme), Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Glenfield Hospital · GBUniversity of Leicester · GBLeicester Royal Infirmary · GBLoughborough University · GB

Funding

Department of Health PDF-2017-10-052Medical Research Council G0601369Medical Research Council MR/N005880/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInvestigating acute multifactorial undifferentiated breathlessness and understanding the driving inflammatory processes can be technically challenging in both adults and children. Being able to validate noninvasive methods such as breath analysis would be a huge clinical advance. The ReCIVA® device allows breath samples to be collected directly onto sorbent tubes at the bedside for analysis of exhaled volatile organic compounds (eVOCs). We aimed to assess the feasibility of using this device in acutely breathless patients.

methodsAdults hospitalised with acute breathlessness and children aged 5-16 years with acute asthma or chronic stable asthma, as well as healthy adult and child volunteers, were recruited. Breath samples were collected onto sorbent tubes using the ReCIVA® device and sent for analysis by means of two-dimensional gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GCxGC-MS). The NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) was used to assess the perceived task workload of undertaking sampling from the patient's perspective.

resultsData were available for 65 adults and 61 children recruited. In total, 98.4% of adults and 75.4% of children were able to provide the full target breath sample using the ReCIVA® device. NASA-TLX measurements were available in the adult population with mean values of 3.37 for effort, 2.34 for frustration, 3.8 for mental demand, 2.8 for performance, 3.9 for physical demand and 2.8 for temporal demand. DISCUSSION: This feasibility study demonstrates it is possible and acceptable to collect breath samples from both adults and children at the bedside for breathomics analysis using the ReCIVA® device.

Identifiers

PMID33263021
PMCPMC7680907
OpenAlexW3108238706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.