Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33262931›Full record

ArticleMaterials today. Proceedings2021

3D printing of nasopharyngeal swabs for COVID-19 diagnose: Past and current trends.

Aluri Manoj, Monami Bhuyan, Swarup Raj Banik, Mamilla Ravi Sankar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials today. Proceedings, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. 3D Printing in the Fight Against Covid-19.Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aluri ManojDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Rajiv Gandhi University of Knowledge Technologies-Basar, Nirmal 504107, India.
Monami BhuyanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Assam Engineering College, Guwahati 781013, Assam, India.
Swarup Raj BanikDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Silchar 788010, Silchar, India.
Mamilla Ravi SankarDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Tirupati 517506, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current technological advancements in emerging 3D printing technologies are indeed propitious. To date, ground-breaking 3D printing technologies are used in automobile, aerospace, clothing, pharma, and biomedical industries by creating pre-requisite engineered and tailored end-user products reaching standard sets. 3D printing is also becoming a crucial technology in support of enhanced health care and general emergency response since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. As the world is facing a significant lack of medicinal supplies, manufactures are struggling to fulfill demands due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. The decline in the diagnostic testing kits supply chained to increased interest in 3D printed Nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs. This article has reviewed and studied the sensitivity of the NP swabs and various NP swab designs. The process of different 3D printing technologies that are employed to address the swab shortages during COVID-19 is explained in detail. The paper ends with the conclusions drawn from the literature review.

Indexed as

3D printed NP swabs3D printingCOVID-19NP swabsRT-PCRSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33262931
PMCPMC7687488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.