Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33262925›Full record

ArticleHealth and technology2021

Using the Technology Acceptance Model to conceptualise experiences of the usability and acceptability of a self-management app (COPD.Pal®) for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Liam Knox, Rachel Gemine, Sarah Rees, Sarah Bowen, Phil Groom, David Taylor, Ian Bond, William Rosser, Keir Lewis

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04142957 (COPD Pal Phase 1), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04142957 completednot on this map

COPD Pal Phase 1: Assessing the Usability and Acceptability of a Self-management App for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

TypeobservationalSponsorHywel Dda Health BoardRan2019 to 2019Enrolled12ConditionsCOPDArmsCOPD Pal
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. User-Centered Design of an Electronic COPD Patient Questionnaire for Clinical Decision Support.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Liam KnoxUniversity of Sheffield, SITraN, 385a Glossop Road, Sheffield, S10 2HQ UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2545-1046
Rachel GemineHywel Dda University Health Board, Carmarthen, UK.
Sarah ReesHywel Dda University Health Board, Carmarthen, UK.
Sarah BowenHywel Dda University Health Board, Carmarthen, UK.
Phil GroomBond Digital Health Ltd., The Maltings, E Tyndall St, Cardiff, CF24 5EA UK.
David TaylorBond Digital Health Ltd., The Maltings, E Tyndall St, Cardiff, CF24 5EA UK.
Ian BondBond Digital Health Ltd., The Maltings, E Tyndall St, Cardiff, CF24 5EA UK.
William RosserSwansea University, Singleton Park, Sketty, Swansea, SA2 8PP UK.
Keir LewisHywel Dda University Health Board, Carmarthen, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a long-term progressive inflammatory lung disease causing chronic breathlessness and many hospital admissions. It affects up to 1.2 million people in the UK. To help people with COPD self-manage their condition we developed, in partnership with healthcare users, a digital mobile phone app called COPD.Pal®. We report the first user feedback of COPD.Pal®, applying the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) theoretical framework. 11 participants engaged with a click dummy version of COPD.Pal® before being asked questions relating to their experiences. A deductive, semantic, reflexive thematic analysis was conducted to analyse their individual and collective experiences. The study was registered at Clinical Trials.gov (NCT04142957). Two overarching themes resulted: Ease of Use and Perceived Usefulness. Within the former, participants discussed how they wanted flexibility and choice in how they engaged with the app; including how often they used it. Additionally, they discussed how the app layout should make it straightforward to use, whilst unanimously agreeing that COPD.Pal® provided this. Within Perceived Usefulness, participants discussed how they wanted the information they entered into the app to be useful, in addition to the app providing resources regarding COPD. Lastly, there was disagreement regarding preferences for further app development. We found that COPD.Pal® was usable and acceptable by people with COPD and TAM provided a useful theoretical framework for both structuring discussions with users and analysing their comments.

Indexed as

Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseReflective thematic analysisSelf-managementTechnology acceptance modelUser-centred design

Identifiers

PMID33262925
PMCPMC7690946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.