ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2020
Long-term fracture load of all-ceramic crowns: Effects of veneering ceramic thickness, application techniques, and cooling protocol.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fractured Full-Arch Tooth-Supported Zirconia Bridge: Thin Design, Surface Damage, and Excessive Cement Layer Thickness.Reports (MDPI) · 2026Article
- Effect of cementation protocols on the fracture load of bilayer ceramic crowns manufactured by the Rapid Layer Technology.Brazilian dental journal · 2024Article
- Article
- Effect of Finishing Protocols on the Surface Roughness and Fatigue Strength of a High-Translucent Zirconia.International journal of dentistry · 2023Article
- Comparison of Fracture Load of the Four Translucent Zirconia Crowns.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Effect of three different veneering techniques on the stress distribution and in vitro fatigue behavior of core-veneer all-ceramic fixed partial dentures.Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate, MATERIAL AND
methods80 frameworks were made from zirconia by the CAD/CAM technique and divided into 8 groups (n = 10) according to the factors: "application technique" (stratified-L and pressed -P), "thickness" (1 mm and 2 mm), and "cooling protocol" (slow-S and fast-F) of the feldspathic veneering ceramic. After, all crowns were cemented over G10 preparations with resin cement (Panavia F, Kuraray), mechanically cycled (2x106 cycles, 200 N, 3Hz), and subjected to the axial compression resistance test (0.5 mm/min, 10 kN). The data (N) underwent descriptive statistical analysis by 3-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (5%). Fracture analysis was performed to determine the possible origin of failure.
resultsThe factors "cooling protocol" (
conclusionsThe pressed technique, used with a slow-cooling protocol, leads to the best outcome for the veneering of all-ceramic crowns.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.