Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33262619›Full record

ArticleInfection and drug resistance2020

Plasmid-Mediated AmpC β-Lactamase

Subhas Chandra Aryal, Milan Kumar Upreti, Anil Kumar Sah, Meharaj Ansari, Krishus Nepal, Binod Dhungel, Nabaraj Adhikari, Binod Lekhak, Komal Raj Rijal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A review of the mechanisms that confer antibiotic resistance in pathotypes ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. UropathogenicMicroorganisms · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Antimicrobial Peptides: From Design to Clinical Application.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Detection of NDM Variants (Infection and drug resistance · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Subhas Chandra Aryal *Golden Gate International College, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-6457-7621
Milan Kumar Upreti *Golden Gate International College, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Anil Kumar SahAnnapurna Neurological Institute and Allied Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0001-5428-8503
Meharaj AnsariShi-Gan Int'l College of Science and Technology (SICOST), Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0003-3396-9056
Krishus NepalGolden Gate International College, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Binod DhungelCentral Department of Microbiology, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-7193-9109
Nabaraj AdhikariCentral Department of Microbiology, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-5501-9011
Binod LekhakGolden Gate International College, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Komal Raj RijalCentral Department of Microbiology, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0001-6281-8236
Tribhuvan University · NPHelen Keller International Nepal · NPAnnapurna Neurological Institute and Allied Sciences · NP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibiotic resistance mediated by the production of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and AmpC β-lactamases is posing a serious threat in the management of the infections caused by Gram-negative pathogens. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of two AmpC β-lactamases genes, MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 1151 clinical samples were obtained and processed at the microbiology laboratory of Annapurna Neurological Institute and Allied Science, Kathmandu between June 2017 and January 2018. Gram-negative isolates thus obtained were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) using Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. AmpC β-lactamase production was detected by disk approximation method using phenylboronic acid (PBA). Confirmed AmpC β-lactamase producers were further screened for

resultsOut of 1151 clinical specimens, 22% (253/1152) had bacterial growth. Of the total isolates, 89.3% (226/253) were Gram-negatives, with

conclusionsHigh prevalence of AmpC β-lactamase-producers in our study is an alarming sign. This study recommends the use of modern diagnostic facilities in the clinical settings for early detection and management which can optimize the treatment therapies, curb the growth and spread of the drug-resistant pathogens.

Indexed as

AmpC β-lactamaseblaCITMblaDHAMESBLsMDRpolymerase chain reaction

Identifiers

PMID33262619
PMCPMC7699442
OpenAlexW3108229654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.